660

Boycotting FOSS projects in the wake of the "buy canadian/european" movement makes no sense (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 5 days ago by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

145 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've seen many threads suggesting products but they often don't mention FOSS projects, which should always be preferred to corporate software. With FOSS you are already boycotting capitalism, on either side. Free and Open Source ignores borders and shouldn't be categorized in nationalist terms, no matter where some of the maintainers happen to live.

(page 2) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

There are some pretty corporate "open core" software companies tho, that's a more grey area

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] chmod755@feddit.org 9 points 5 days ago

Agreed.

[-] jrozycki@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago

I think there is a different problem. Many of the best FOSS products are unknown to the general public ;/

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

I think you're missing the point a bit.

Both BuyCanadian and BuyEuropean are about supporting their respective economies as they are boycotting America's.

For Canada, we're looking at a recession (brought on by our "ally") so people are trying to help fellow Canadians out as things get rough and people lose jobs.

While I support FOSS and recommend them in threads etc I fully understand why they don't meet all the goals of those movements. (That being said, I think one of the most rocking counter punches would be EU investment in stabilizing Linux enough to make it a feasible alternative to Windows/Apple for casual and corporate users, solid shot to 2 of the magnificent 7.)

[-] skarn@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 5 days ago

investment in stabilizing Linux enough to make it a feasible alternative

Do you care to elaborate? If I had to write a list of reasons why Linux might not be ready for your average cubicle... Stability wouldn't be one of them.

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Not the other commenter, but they likely meant stability with respect to device drivers. The kernel is great at not degrading with a high uptime, but there's consumer stuff that's just perpetually unimplemented, buggy, or minimally-functional:

Sensor monitoring on Ryzen platforms
Realtek NIC chipsets
Nvidia cards and proprietary drivers for anything and everything other than compute workloads
Nvidia cards older than the RTX 2000 series and FOSS drivers
Peripherals targeted towards "gamers"

None of this is the kernel maintainers fault, of course. The underlying issue is the usual one of shitty corporations refusing to publish documentation and/or strategically abusing the legal system to stifle reverse engineering for interoperability.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments