30
submitted 4 weeks ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Summary

Donald Trump defended Russia's massive missile and drone attack on Ukraine that followed his administration's halt to intelligence sharing and military aid to Kyiv, saying Putin was "doing what anybody would do."

Trump told reporters he finds it "easier" to work with Russia than Ukraine, claiming Putin "wants to end the war."

While threatening vague sanctions against Russia on social media, Trump's actual actions have targeted Ukraine, including cutting off military supplies and disabling Ukraine's access to satellite imagery.

Ukrainian forces have reportedly suffered battlefield setbacks as a direct result of these U.S. policy changes.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 weeks ago

Trump says Putin says

[-] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

Siding with the Russians.

Good God, America.

Look at yourself, FFS!

[-] Aux@feddit.uk 2 points 4 weeks ago
[-] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Wow! These guys are so blinded by their love of privilidge.

Trust me, you’d rather be a Dem.

Fucking clueless.

[-] Aux@feddit.uk 2 points 4 weeks ago

Mate, that was during Trump's first term. Trust me, they're better off in Russia.

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Okay let's game this out then. If you had a president who is stomping on your civil rights, tearing down the safety net, and crashing your economy - what is it that 'anyone would do'?

[-] troglodytis@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

Play Nintendo. I like the character that wears green

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Luigi

Weegee

Green Mario

L U I G I fucking M a n GiO N E

[-] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 weeks ago
[-] P1nkman@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago
[-] Naz@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Wait really? Since when? I've gotta try it now:

Luigi Mangione

Nope, that seems to work

[-] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 weeks ago

Just saying a person's name isn't the threshold, this isn't reddit. But no, calling for violence on .world typically results in mod action.

[-] schema@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Someone should ask him what he would do if Russia took Alaska.

[-] OnASnowyEvening@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Well, you'd have to ask, was there a reason they took Alaska? They might have a good reason. Maybe they think there was something wrong with how we bought it from them. They might feel we took advantage of them. I mean, wouldn't you sympathize with someone that felt taken advantage of? They'll have a good reason. Russia wouldn't do anything on a whim. Not just to enrich themselves or establish a beachhead for the rest of the continental Americas; surely not.

Of course... even if it were a beachhead... Russia might have a good reason, and we like Russia, they're good friends. Maybe we should join together in some kind of union...

/s

PS: If someone was nodding their head along with the above, just know you're on the wrong side of... well, everything.

[-] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago

I wouldn't do that.

[-] otto@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 weeks ago
[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago
[-] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 weeks ago

Good luck dealing with a Mexican insurgency.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

I would heartily support one.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 0 points 4 weeks ago

mexico??? you know the panama/canada/greenland talk yeah.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 0 points 4 weeks ago

It's been a long standing right wing fantasy of sending the us military to deal with the cartels

[-] commander@lemmings.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

What about that is right-wing?

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 0 points 4 weeks ago

When your response to complicated situation that could be solved with non-violence is to send in the military - that's right wing

[-] commander@lemmings.world -1 points 4 weeks ago

How do we solve it with non-violence?

[-] mira13@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Fix the root issue. Cartels thrive because yanks want drugs. Yanks mostly want drugs because there are issues in their lives they want to run away from and end up addicted to said drugs. Decriminalizing possession and offering detox programs to those addicted would already help reduce the demand by making people willing and able to come forward to get treatment for a drug addiction without fear of being arrested and having their lives ruined further. Then you can attack the source of this desire for drugs by passing laws that actually help people by offering them social safety nets and access to healthcare. Then you can legalize far less addicting and dangerous drugs like cannabis so people who do seek drugs won't go to black market ones that help cartels thrive.

There are SOOOOO many little steps that can be taken to reduce the power of cartels, but that would require Yanks to actually care about one another, not just about their own wallet and be willing to go for complex solutions, not just the easy solution of just shoot your problem, so I guess that's just never happening.

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 points 4 weeks ago

Wonderfully said!

Indeed, when we've based our society around "get rich or die trying" and a constant state of misery is the motivator to work ever-demanding jobs with less compensation, and people are scared to lose the house over an ambulance ride...

The US practically molded the cartels' success from their own policies. A cartel is simply violent unfettered capitalism, after all. They are destructively "filling a need."

We could reduce or eliminate that need, but the State would rather crush their competition in the misery business.

It's no wonder we saw the serious rise of the cartels especially around the 1970's and onward, and that's when the working class started its increasingly rapid descent.

[-] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 1 points 4 weeks ago

So another way to read this is Trump admitting that he wants to invade Ukraine?

[-] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yes when he sprung the bloody wedding type ambush on Zelensky. Right up to that moment his sycophants did not agree that he was on the fascist dictator's side, but since then they ofc all turned their coat because even their decades long chant of being world moral police it only took one self proclaimed Jesus to flip their whole purpose into violence. It's very sad and hard to belive

[-] superflycrazy@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago

the blue and yellow suit is beyond insulting. petty observation. shrug.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

"... with the intel that we gave to them."

Literally viewing the world like a EU4 map painting player would

[-] Oomny@lemmy.ca -1 points 4 weeks ago

Sure....it's what anyone would do to defeat their enemies.

[-] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 3 weeks ago

No. Some would not invade and destroy a country and say "I want to end this war" while not honoring 24 ceasefires in a row continuing to bombard civilian targets.

this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
30 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45457 readers
2783 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS