49
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The Pentagon has awarded Elon Musk’s SpaceX its first confirmed contract for the Starshield network it’s developing, a military-specific version of the company’s Starlink satellite internet system, the defense agency said Wednesday.

A Space Force spokesperson confirmed that SpaceX on Sept. 1 was awarded a one-year contract for Starshield with a maximum value of $70 million. The award came alongside 18 other companies through a program run by the Space Force’s commercial satellite communications office.

“The SpaceX contract provides for Starshield end-to-end service (via the Starlink constellation), user terminals, ancillary equipment, network management and other related services,” Space Force spokesperson Ann Stefanek told CNBC.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] b3an@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Until Musk decides to play with the service? Based on his own ideas of how to play God in the war? CNN: Musk turned off Starlink near Crimea to disrupt Ukraine's strike against Russian fleet

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe it's a trap. Perhaps its harder to punish musk for his Ukraine shortcomings, but if he decideds to fuck up under federal contract with the MIC of the US government . . .

I only think of this because I cant imagine the pentagon thinks highly of him, hes a borderline (possibly unwitting) russian apologist at best and asset at worst. Usually Im not so sure bad things happen to rich people, but crossing the MIC would probably be the line that does it if anything does.

[-] Draegur@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I'm sure the US government would love nothing more than to smash musk open like a piggy bank and annex everything he owns through some mix of civil asset forfeiture and eminent domain on sloppily and carelessly assembled rhetorical basis that boils down to "because we say so," and also "what are you going to do about it anyway loser, we have nukes" plus furthermore "you can't possibly pretend like this dipshit didn't have it coming. If one does not wish to find out, one should not fuck around"

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

They don’t need to make up a basis to take over his stuff, it already exists and has existed for almost 75 years. They’d just tie his hands with the defense production act if push came to shove. They could then just lock Elon up if he refused to do what he was told.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

He's an intentional Russia apologist. Period. You don't get to be the richest person on Earth and not be invited to a few private meetings with international leaders. He regularly promotes the idea that Ukraine is evil and Russia is doing good on Twitter.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have a conspiracy theory that Musk utilized Russian troll farms to hype up his pump and dump scheems when those were his big thing. That would explain the meetings with Putin, the proclivity to do what Putin says, and his purchase of twitter under the guise of removing the bots and free speech then not removing the bots. He probably just removed the evidence.

[-] Wooster@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago

That kinda makes sense.

Sanctions only work because of pre-existing trade with unscrupulous powers. Similar logic.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Our government shouldn't be rewarded him shit and we should seize it and nationalize all his companies. After all our taxes subsidized it to begin with.

[-] Thann@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

Wait, I thought he didn't want to militarize his company because he was afraid of antagonizing the russians!?!?

[-] GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

He didn't want to militarize for free

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Hey, let's buy critical services from a right-wing shitbag who has a history of tampering with those services to affect the outcome of military operations on behalf of Russia.

What could go wrong?

[-] grayman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They're buying control.

this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
49 points (96.2% liked)

News

23311 readers
1230 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS