188
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to c/yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com


Edit: Even MBFC rates dropsitenews as a reliable source https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/drop-site-news-bias-and-credibility/

MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

There is no rule about 'blog sites' on worldnews. Jordanlund has made this up and proceeds to classify anything he does not like as a 'blog '.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago

Reading the comments here is a treat.

tl;dr Jordan dude may not be a Zionist, but their refusal to acknowledge a legitimate news source, even though it fields an array of veteran investigative journalists, formerly from The Intercept, just because it uses Substack under the hood, which they equate to WordPress (which is another platform used by big publications) makes them a PTB.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

It gets even worse down below.

In order to defend MBFC Jordan starts calling MondoWeiss antisemitic. Jordan quotes Zionist lobby sources to back up his claims, without any evidence of the antisemitism accusations except hearsay. Then refuses to engage when pressed on the issue.

https://lemmy.world/post/27393569/16039954

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 days ago

And even go on another anti blm rant

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

"We only allow reputable news sources! Now excuse me while I repeat a bunch of misinformation about BLM."

  • jordanlund
[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago

it's not misinformation if the mbfc says it is a good source

[-] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 5 days ago

Beyond the publicly known political preference of the mod, I think it's strange that a community on a social media site built on activitypub would have a blanked policy against the posting of other self-published news sources, irrespective of the authors and journalists and their proven reputation.

That said, my take on lemmy moderation has always been JDS, or 'just decentralize, stupid'. We're not reddit, and we don't want to be like reddit, so we shouldn't be going out of our way to centralize communities or complain when we don't like the moderation choices or rules of a community we think ought to be managed differently.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

Bruh its Jordan. Worst mod around. Just par for the course.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 45 points 6 days ago

We've been over this.

Anyone can set up a Substack blog. It's not a valid source. Same with Blogger, same with Medium.

If it gets posted through a legitmate news source, it's 100% welcome.

Blog sites aren't news.

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 31 points 6 days ago

Substack is not a blogging platform. You can host a blog using Substack, but not every site built using Substack is a blog.

Dropsitenews is clearly not a blog. That should be immediately evident if you open the website. The about-page also clearly explains how they are an independent news organization with reputable journalists working for it. Even MBFC classifies them as a news organization.

If your argument is "it's a substack website so it's a blog, but a completely identical-looking website that's not built using substack isn't a blog, so it's allowed", then you're not arguing along the lines of rule 1, you're arguing along the lines of an unwritten rule that is supposed to help reinforce rule 1. If so, it should be explained in the sidebar. The post as-is does not violate rule 1 in any reasonable interpretation. If you have a different argumentation as to why Dropsitenews is a blog, you should provide it so that people know what to expect from the mod team.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] CabbageRelish@midwest.social 38 points 6 days ago

Drop Site is not a simple “substack blog.” It’s a new project created and run by journalists/founders from The Intercept who parted ways because of their mismanagement. Everyone including the journalist who shared this article has extensive experience as a professional journalist and bylines with major publications.

Is Time a blog because it runs on Wordpress?

[-] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 20 points 5 days ago

Oh whoa, this is a really good point.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/drop-site-news-bias-and-credibility/

High credibility, mostly factual.

@jordanlund@lemmy.world ?

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Arcka@midwest.social 25 points 6 days ago

This is an absolutely braindead lazy take.

The same professional journalists who've worked at these big media corporations have used the substack platform to open up sites in droves so they can focus on more niche topics, or just escape the censorship of owners and advertisers.

If you think that legitimate news can only come from a company owned by billionaires, then you're wrong.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 days ago

Hey genius blogs are as reliable as the journalist who wrote them... just like a newspaper...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I’m with you here. News sites will mirror this to confirm its legitimacy, and that should be linked, not the substack.

People don’t like it, but man, I would love it if Lemmy preserves information hygiene as it grows.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (89 replies)
[-] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 days ago

What's a good alternative to Worldnews?

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 30 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Sorry, YDI.

It's a known rule, it's been explained, and there are other places to post if you don't like that rule.

If it was the only C/ for posting things like that, it might not matter much that the rule about substack exists, but there are many places for it.

Edit: also, it's just a removal, that's not even close to power tripping by itself; there would have to be other factors to approach that standard.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It is not a rule. Nowhere in the sidebar of the worldnews subreddit does it say that SubStack is not a valid source. Nor does it say anything about "blogs". It says

Post news articles only

And this is most definitely a news article.

JordanLund is using his moderator powers to selectively decide what is and what is not "news" at his own whims.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
188 points (80.3% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

749 readers
154 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS