1318
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IDrawPoorly@lemm.ee 5 points 5 days ago

Yeah but why would you want to need to?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] slothrop@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago

JD's pager.

[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago

My 50 year old "dumb" doorbell doesn't need to be recharged. More proof that "smart" technology isn't actually smarter and isn't actually making our lives easier.

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

A doorbell like this requires recharging because it is wireless.

Meaning you don’t need to drill holes, just connect it to your WiFi.

Maybe screw the holder into something (or just command strip it to your door).

It removes to recharge.

Other smart door bells connect to existing power, and don’t need recharging.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

I'm not sure you know what proof is

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] the_wiz@feddit.org 3 points 5 days ago

I mean.. yeah, having all the electronic gadgets that spy on you and let you read the post of the worlds united village yokels is great, but, just as a thought... why do i need to recharge my phone at least once a day when the Atari Portfolio (which was / is a nearly full IBM PC compatible computer) that was build in '89 did last about A MONTH on 3 AA batteries that i could buy nearly everywhere in the world?

Imagine a world where not every consumer electronic is controled by layers upon layers upon layers of cruft running on an operating system that in its core still thinks it is powering an PDP11 and talking to a bunch of teletypes...

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Most of the charge is consumed by bright big colourful screen. Atari Portfolio had a black and white screen that supports 4 lines of text with no backlight.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tacobellhop@midwest.social 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You can just say the 70s, people.

There is zero percent chance someone is gonna confuse it with 1870 and 2070 is 65 years away.

Edit: lol math sheesh 45 years I might be high

[-] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 5 points 5 days ago

As much as I wish it was still 2005, we must face the fact that it's 2025 and 2070 is only 45 years away.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 6 days ago

Imagine explaining in-vehicle-mounted devices which play sound recordings on giant vinyl discs to people from the 2030s.

https://www.hagerty.com/media/automotive-history/obsolete-car-audio-part-2/

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Wait, does this mean that if you have a smart doorbell, someone could just walk up to it, grab it, and walk away with it?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
1318 points (99.1% liked)

People Twitter

6668 readers
1548 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS