[-] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 23 points 7 months ago

instead of you telling the employer that they have to prove their value or the deal is off.

What?

Performance review is from the employers side, obviously.

There is nothing stopping from you to walking into your boss' office and telling them that you're not getting paid enough for the work you do. Then either they pay you more or don't and you find a better job.

[-] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 32 points 8 months ago

Man, and it works great. It is waaaaay more common to find good answers to a question from a bunch of randoms on the Internet than trying to get an actual answer from a random website. Sometimes you find bs but you can usually quite quickly filter it out, and it gives a good basis from which to then continue to search on the topic.

[-] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 34 points 9 months ago

Company does a thing required by law.

Pikachu face.

[-] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 33 points 9 months ago

A Amazon? I am way more triggered about that than I should.

[-] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 33 points 10 months ago

It should be noted that this report includes emissions from the entire production chain and the use of said item and places it to the company. Someone makes a car and you drive it for 1 000 000km and the company that made the car is now responsible for the pollution you caused by driving. Actually, the companies who made the materials to make the car are responsible, according to the report.

[-] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 31 points 10 months ago

I remember that at least the Finnish reason for abstaining is that Hamas was not mentioned nor their attack condemned in any way in the cease fire resolution. Canada started a petition to change the wording of the resolution and most countries who abstained voted for this.

[-] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 23 points 10 months ago

Are you talking about YouTube? At least currently ublock is working fine in there and I have not encountered popups.

[-] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 28 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm confused. The article states that the monthly feed is to remove ad targeting, which I assume means no ads. It does NOT say that they won't collect data on you, just literally that they won't use the data they collect to give you ads.

So this has nothing to do with opting out of data collection, just opting out of ads? That's the feeling I get from the article.

Edit. Well I guess I'm not confused, this is also the wording the Meta's post uses and definitely says nothing about opting out of data collection.

[-] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 year ago

Can't wait to need an ad blocker in my brain.

[-] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 year ago

It is such a great thing to see how the big corporations are using their power. For the betterment of the people. For their customers. The customers just are wrong and they need to be shown the true path. True path of Google (among other companies). Come join us. There will be cookies (through a subscription service, now -50% if you subscribe for a year!! What a deal!). We are good and just (terms and conditions may apply).

Join us.

[-] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 30 points 1 year ago

I always think it as the difference between a nice vacation and a whole generation.

[-] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 29 points 1 year ago

Even disregarding all bigotry and racism that this screams of, it's dumb af because kids can be friends with FUCKING rocks. It's pretty much their superpower.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

AnonStoleMyPants

joined 1 year ago