I disagree, I'd get one if I could use it as a second monitor! Though if you can't navigate in the "screen", then it could be difficult. But yeah AR definitely would make things muuuch more interesting.

You use it on Linux? I have used it in Windows (6700xt) and it is slow af (2 it/s or even in s/it range), apparently it should be a lot faster in Linux but haven't tested it.

Could just be the language. In Finnish "limonadi" is soda, though you barely hear that word nowadays. Hence, not hard to think that sprite is lemonade.

Sure yes I agree that it is shady and weird that they just don't say what data is being sent. Not really sure why they don't.

It's not that the data being sent is like too much or too in detail (though maybe WiFi ssid is unnecessary), it's just that the company is weirdly not being upfront about this.

Not really. But it would be difficult because I have many things I need to keep track of. If I need to later figure out if I did X for Y then I need to be able to find it. Or if I quickly need to find every step I've done relating to Y it gets difficult. Only way would be to write everything basically twice, to a notepad (or page) about Y, and also to my journal where I quickly jot down what I have done today.

I've thought about digitizing notes and using something like hashtags which I could then search for but it was way too much of a hit and miss to covert handwriting to a searchable format.

Of course having a good index would make things easier but dunno. Maybe I'll take another shot at it at some point.

95% digital. Work journal is in Tiddlywiki and that's basically it. Todo lists I do tend to do with pen & paper.

I like pen and paper but searching is always such a fucking hassle and my hand writing is garbo. If I know I don't need to actually find anything later then it's great (doodling and thinking about something). I guess I could do pen and paper and layer save into digital but meh.

Yeah I guess that's the issue. It has to look good. Otherwise it's just garbage on the walls.

Most of the time it does not look good (imo of course), but of course there are exceptions.

Yeah we used styrofoam and melted it into this weird goo that sticks everywhere. Was dope.

Damn that's actually pretty simple way to use differential equations to show this.

Edit. The series one is also pretty simple.

I should play the campaign through again. Haven't played the game after the 10 acts became a thing so essentially I'm just a noob again. I've mostly read that people are sick of the campaign because they have already played it a billion times, and not that first timers are having a bad time.

Bland, really? I've never thought it being bland. Though I have not played the game aftee the 10 acts became a thing so maybe it has changed.

Yeah I understand that of course a random instance could just change the code so that nothing is deleted. However, what I meant is that in the documentation states that the instance can use this Tombstone instead of deleting and it seems like it is completely "fine" and within the rules to do so. I am referring to this:

... the server receiving the delete activity SHOULD remove its representation of the object with the same id, and MAY replace that representation with a Tombstone object.

From https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/#delete-activity-inbox

So they should do it but it is also OK to use this different thing. Or am I misunderstanding this comment and it means that instances need to delete the object, and after the fact it is allowed for instances to furthermore make this Tombstone to somehow track that yes there was a deleted object here?