[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 26 points 7 hours ago

Wait....is someone watching us?

Nooooooooo, nonono, absolutely not. Trust me honey I have very good eyesight and I can't seAAAAAAHHHHH

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

I would say it depends on the human. Same reason why I only eat jerk chicken.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Certainly! A cupcake is the perfect treat to share with friends or just enjoy by yourself. Here is a simple recipe.

Equipment and Ingredients

  • One cake of your chosen flavour
  • One cup. Any size can be used but for safety reasons a standard groin guard is recommended.

Directions

  1. Place the cake on a stable surface such as a cutting board or road. If choosing a road a paved road is recommended as it is able to withstand more pressure but a runway is ideal due to the strict tolerance used in their construction.
  2. Using the cup, scoop the cake so that the flesh of the cake is captured by the cup. It is recommended to start from the centre and work outwards to ensure the maximum amount of cake is captured.

Serving

You may optionally remove the cake from the cup and place it in an appropriate vessel such as a bowl or tallship to serve but it is also considered normal to consume directly from the cup.

I hope that was helpful and please enjoy your cupcake!

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

Finished watching the rest of The Orville. I really enjoyed it!

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

I'm trying to say..... exactly what I said. That your message didn't tell the whole story. In fact it's not much of a stretch to say it's actively misleading. I'll try and do more to articulate why, see if you agree with me.

You said:

The 1 child policy only ever applied to around 30% of the population anyways. It was just Han Chinese in major urban centers.

First of all, the statement itself is actually false because whilst it was changed after a few years, it did in fact apply to everyone initially so you can't truthfully say that it "only ever" applied to 1/3 of the population.

Secondly, the 35.4% figure is of people who were subjected to the original one child policy restrictions. There was still a one child policy in place even for rural people except in the case that the first child was a girl. Given this happens about 50% of the time, effectively around 67% of families would still be restricted to one child, even under the revised policy. I'm neglecting the exception for minorities as by definition they are a small share of the population.

So yes, I maintain that what you said did not provide a complete or particularly accurate picture. It's true that the policy wasn't as simple as "nobody can have more than one child ever" but your comment was about equally accurate as that statement I would say. By saying the policy only ever applied to about 30% of people you are in my opinion misrepresenting the sheer scale and impact of the policy.

Hopefully that helps to explain why I felt the need to comment, but feel free to tell me if I'm wrong or misunderstanding something.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 40 points 12 hours ago

One might even say it's an ExtremelyDrawnOutMethodNamesFactoryImpl

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 41 points 13 hours ago

Indeed, everyone certainly made a meal of it.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 9 points 13 hours ago

Almost certainly

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 11 points 13 hours ago

The Emptiness Machine In My Ass

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago

What if I only eat my own meat?

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 9 points 14 hours ago

The sheer Depp's people will go to with these memes

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago

Huh, no wonder those cows are so chilled out

1

I thought this was a nice 10 minute recap of what the replication layer stuff is, the plans we know about from way back and where we're at now.

view more: next ›

Aurenkin

joined 1 year ago