Miller is doing this stuff as part of his official governmental duties, so this is technically not domestic terrorism. It's state terrorism.
Forgetting AI for a moment, I am always shocked when I am reviewing a coworker's code and it's obvious that they themselves didn't review it.
Like, they sent me a PR that has a whole shitload of other crap in it. Why should I look at it when you haven't looked at it? If you don't review your own review requests, you're a failure of a ~~programmer~~ human.
And I would be a failure if I approved such a request.
Getting back to the post, where is all of the review? The coworker should have reviewed the AI shit, whether it was code or documentation. The person who approved the PR should have reviewed it, as well.
Every business with more than one programmer should have at least two levels of safeguards against this exact thing happening. More if you include different types of test suites.
This post describes a fundamentally broken business, regardless of the AI angle, and so it's good if everything is broken. With such a lack of discipline and principles, I say let the business fail.
YouTube: Experiencing delays? Click here to find out why.
Me: No thanks, I'm pretty sure there is some electronic war going on between you and my ad blocker causing it.
Reminds me of how Duchamp's Fountain was attacked.
If I had an AI art exhibition, I would definitely arrange for someone to come destroy it like this, as there is very little point to having an AI art exhibition otherwise.
During Trump's first term, I identified this as the number one most annoying thing about Trump. That you don't want the world's biggest attention whore as president.
And the only good thing about Trump was that he didn't actually do the job. He just watched TV and called into Fox News and took extended golfing holidays.
I still cannot comprehend how people seemed to forget this during Biden's term, when you could actually go a week or more without hearing about the president.
BillyClark
joined 6 days ago
It has never occurred to me that other people trust PRs, even a little. I mean, that they might think about it in those terms.
This explains a lot to me.
Why does it take me longer to review code than other people? They trust the person who wrote it, but I don't.
Why is it that when my coworkers think a person is untrustworthy, that they always end up begging me to do all of that person's reviews. It's because I'm not bothered by that. I already treat everybody as untrustworthy.
I've never understood how other people think when they do reviews, I guess.