[-] BlueBockser@programming.dev 21 points 2 months ago

Nothing, this is not about that.

This change gives you the guarantee that .internal domains will never be registered officially, so you can use them without the risk of your stuff breaking should ICANN ever decide to make whatever TLD you're using an official TLD.

That scenario has happened in the past, for example for users of FR!TZBox routers which use fritz.box. .box became available for purchase and someone bought fritz.box, which broke browser UIs. This could've even been used maliciously, but thankfully it wasn't.

[-] BlueBockser@programming.dev 14 points 9 months ago

I guess the snarky headline might've been a bit too much for some people

[-] BlueBockser@programming.dev 15 points 9 months ago

Revenue is the wrong metric for this type of comparison. Last I heard even big tech didn't have a profit margin of 100%.

[-] BlueBockser@programming.dev 16 points 11 months ago

You need to follow trusted sources like the IDF

Ah yes, there's nothing quite like trusting one side exclusively. No way they would ever lie for their own benefit!

[-] BlueBockser@programming.dev 20 points 1 year ago

Grundsätzlich ja, aber es gibt auch Situationen in denen sie sinnvoll ist. Nicht umsonst sind Beleidigungen nicht von der Meinungsfreiheit gedeckt. Ich jedenfalls bin dankbar, wenn ich mir nicht mehr präpubertäre Kinder anhören muss, die meine Mutter beleidigen.

[-] BlueBockser@programming.dev 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just because you like Brave the search engine doesn't mean you have to use Brave the browser. The two have no inherent connection.

Edit: While we're on the subject of money, I'd be more worried about that Peter Thiel money Brave took. That man openly claims freedom and democracy to be incompatible and supports efforts to create independent libertarian societies on international waters and in space.

[-] BlueBockser@programming.dev 15 points 1 year ago

Wirklich tolle Gegenargumente. Also mich haste überzeugt.

[-] BlueBockser@programming.dev 21 points 1 year ago

The whole concept is incredibly ugly

Depends on the viewpoint. As a software consumer, sure. As a software producer though, not having to deal with with tons of different packaging formats and repositories for different distributions and versions is a blessing.

[-] BlueBockser@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago

I think git clean is more appropriate. With git stash you create a stash which you then have to drop.

[-] BlueBockser@programming.dev 20 points 1 year ago

It's called moderation and without it, discussions devolve into ad hominem - as you proved.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

BlueBockser

joined 1 year ago