[-] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

no matter what time it is going to be the second, agian the Democrats are not beholden to the people, they know who's intrests they serve and they lerch farther to the right each election

[-] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

This is assuming that the dems are anything but Captialist lapdogs, and willing to do any of this. They will not I am sorry to tell you that

[-] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I would say nither, agian there profit is direct theft from there workers I see no reason to enable said theft by turning off my add block or not bypassing a paywall

[-] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I mean thats bullshit, because they are being told move left, and they are saying "well we dont know how left so we are going to move right vote for us your your terrible" that is not the way to handle this. You start to move left and you will gain more voters, and if you keep moving you will find the point that satifies most of them.

You are very likely to lose votes by doing this, see the decreased voter turn out, and the varuable voter turn out, you are losing people as they stop approving of you, and the likelyhood of you gaining new voters shrinks as you chace a narrower and narrower market

[-] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

except the slice of the pie being argued over is so small now, you have to get the group of people who vote republican, but are willing to conseve of voting for the democrat, and then pull them off ...

the math does not add up when to the left of democrats there is a large untapped market, you can see some of this by the lesser evilism argumentation, that there are people once agian near the drop off point of being able to approve of the democratic canidate. Even one step to the left would open up a large amount of voters back up, aswell as father sure up and engage the base, allowing for a more energetic and larger voter turnout.

also agian... the staffers and cheney should be enough given no denouncement or rejection of the endorsement to get anyone who was alive during those times who was opposed to them to keep from supporting harris, or atleast question the suport

[-] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

you merely posted a link aserting that it was credible, I said that it was not, no one has presented a link over the credibility, my argument is that basic media litericy shows that this has severe biases and not truthful, you have provided nothing, we are still operating under asertions

[-] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I have provided the same level of evidence, that you have that it is credible or factual or not bias. You where the one that made the positive claim, as is typical rules you have the burdon of proof

second my evidence is ... BASIC meida litericy skills

[-] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

the reason there are more active voters in the middle is the ones to the left see no gain in voting for either mainstreem, once you loose appeal you cannot draw people to vote, this is a fundimentaly flawed stratagy that disposesses the left

[-] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

We could expect Harris to denoucne the endorsements and tell them to F-off instead of reveling in the ensorsements, that would be a start

[-] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I mean odd that you KNOW none of these people where going to vote for Harris but these endorsments will get people to vote for Harris from the trump camp. I mean I would argue that there are people who remember past political actions and do not want to suport someone also suported by ghools, and this was either the last straw, or enough that they felt there was some alterer motive here.

Second, have you seen any trump suporter, or someone thinking about suporting trump they are unlikely to be pulled away.

third, threat to democracy? I mean I hate to break it to you but at best the US is an Oligopoly, and even then I would argue the dems are just a few steps behind. As for the the SCOTUS, what is stopping biden from using the above the law power... or Haris, why is this only a concern when trump might use it

fourth, you have to relise that DICK CHENEY endorsing your canidate is not going to be a good look, especialy reveling in it. the better political move would be to use his endorsement to open up a conversation about all the evil he did, and the farther promotion of the Unitary Executive (Really started by Reagon and his staffers... who also endorsed harris) leading us into the mess we are in today, and to shove that endorsement where the sun dont shine

[-] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

No one said that. maybe they should have been crtitical of her not disavoying it

view more: ‹ prev next ›

CooperRedArmyDog

joined 2 years ago