they still have get the receipt for Gaza

Who cares what this bootlicker says

how dare put the US in the same context, they are the good guys

what is there to question? the us are traitors.

can you back that up?

There is no EU army, Czech Army is their own, Nato is an "defense" organisation where parts of other countries armies participate in

you should read the definition of a genocide first, that would be something like Rwanda or Gaza, Ukraine not. The russians started the official war, the background work and preparations for it were done by many other parties

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/09/world/middleeast/ukraine-shahed-drone-middle-east.html?smid=url-share

https://www.euronews.com/2026/03/14/iranian-lawmaker-says-ukraines-drone-support-makes-it-a-legitimate-war-target

long story short, you are saying that in the long run we will start buying EU weapons. That is a very long run, a marathon. Untill then its uncle sams bodega.

Your point about EU contries wanting to have small armies and stay under US umbrella is wrong. Ask the french, de Gaulle kicked them out in the 50ies. The axis didn't have that choice.

As my last point, here is an quote from Natos first secretary, Lord Hastings Ismay in 1949. "keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down"

one last thing, let me remind you about Victoria Nuland, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, and her famous "Fuck the EU."

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26079957

I am eager to hear your opinion about it.

...by buying weapons from american companies. Sure, Trump didn't get the money directly, but the companies he is being lobbied by.

No we shouldn't. Nato is America, whetehr one likes it or not, without their active participation (equal), there is no need to funnel the money into it. Invest it in to EU army, not American.