[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm not sure how you managed to misunderstand, but by disruptions I was referring to precisely the kind of disruptions of the lives of ordinary people that - and I'm sure we can at least agree on this - they have quite successfully caused.

Our two parallel discussions are about the methods of protesting against the use of fossil fuels. Our discussions here exists because of JSO. It got you thinking about what should be done to get rid of the use of fossil fuels, even if this was just for the purposes of making counterarguments.

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You do realize that you replied to a comment just now that raised the issue of fossil fuel subsidies, and the effect those have on the price and thus consumption of oil? Just ending those subsidies would already have a dramatic effect.

It's true that the discussion is currently centered on freedom of speech, most notably because of the most recent developments, but the issue that is being protested is constantly present in the background. I'm betting that after the criminalization of protests stops being news, that issue gets back into the limelight.

Direct action against fossil fuel infrastructure would be less in the public due to a less central location. Sitting on a street works because it's a nuisance to many, thus generating a lot of interest among the press and that way the message gets amplified. Gaining publicity via industrial sabotage would be difficult unless they did somehting very drastic, which would only turn them from a mere "nuicanse" into actual villains in the press. Especially so if some such drastic measure leads to the unintended death or injury of a worker at a refinery etc. This would also turn the fossil fuel companies from crooks into victims and I'm betting that they'd also try to frame it as sabotage hurting the blue collar workers they employ. All this while affecting the actual price of oil in a miniscule way at most and alienating the majority of their members who don't accept these acts. Nonviolence is held in high regard.

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 day ago

The process I described unfortunately does take longer than the initial lashing outs of the establisment. A couple of "martyrs" may not be the worst thing either.

YungOnions already provided you with some good articles about why and how nonviolent disruption works. I suggest you read them.

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You approach the whole issue as if it were just up to consumers to stop oil by changing their habits. It isn't. Switching to an EV isn't a solution when you're still paying taxes that go into subsidizing fossil fuels. (Switching to an EV for getting around in a city isn't a solution anyways, use public transit or get a bicycle). Consumers won't stop consuming oil until the full cost (including all externalities) of it is shown in the price tag. Action is needed at the political level, and that won't happen unless enough noise is made regarding the issue. That's what JSO is doing.

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Disruptions cause outrage

Outrage sparks discusson

Discussion leads to political pressure

Political pressure leads to action that targets the oil industry

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 days ago

Mostly it's just people discussing whether flour should be measured by mass or volume. Jokes about using some mcburgers per football field -esque satirical units, some joke about using moles instead. Some comment about a funny misspelling in the meme. Nobody is flying into an incoherent rage.

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 days ago

I think you're taking the trollface in the meme a bit too literally. It's annoying and unnecessary, and can cause mistakes that wouldn't have been possible otherwise. Ahem, the Mars Climate Orbiter is a good example of a particularly costly one.

Nobody is flying into an incoherent rage. It's merely annoying having to accommodate the outdated quirks of one country. You having to do the opposite is quite reasonable on the other hand, because you're not accommodating the conventions of one country, but those of the rest of the world.

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago

Fair point. Rephrase: largest English speaking country by internet footprint, global influence or some similar measure.

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago

Thank you for the correction kind sir. My deepest apologies sir. English isn't my native language. Would you perhaps care to elaborate on the claim made in your previous comment, so that this here conversation may have some substance beyond mere grammar.

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Bear in mind that there are multiple countries where English is the largest language and metric is used, and that English is the modern lingua franca. It just so happens that the largest english speaking country has some weird ways to measure things. As such those weird measurements and associated conversions are often forced on anyone who wants to look for a recipe in English, be that their native language or not.

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 25 points 6 days ago

Undeniable DPRK W

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 8 points 6 days ago

There's also an unlocked bootloader, if you didn't notice.

804
Walkable rule (sopuli.xyz)
submitted 2 months ago by Deme@sopuli.xyz to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
71
Wagtail rule (sopuli.xyz)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Deme@sopuli.xyz to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

It's looking at the camera like that because we were engaged in dialogue (I whistled to it every time it sang)

-4
submitted 6 months ago by Deme@sopuli.xyz to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
21
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by Deme@sopuli.xyz to c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.ml

Source (in Finnish).

view more: next ›

Deme

joined 1 year ago