Because they're an instrumental part of how the election process works for quite a while now. If a candidate is receiving 0 electoral votes they are functionally as electable as you or I.
You've more than proven yourself to be in bad faith here though, so you'll have to pester someone else with future efforts.
I assumed you understood how a presidential election worked in the US. Was I mistaken?
That's why he and everyone are hugging a strange brown man at the end
In weird things I don't need to remember but do the patch notes for that included a change to the self destruct mechanism regarding whether it was only a bluff tactic or you could actually self destruct.
To make things more odd I can't recall which way the change was. I think it was to actually be able to self destruct.
Rapport is the traditional spelling of that word by the way.
In case you need to connect a written word with a spoken one
Disney has a mouse they can hide behind, but they don't. If they think you'll make money off three circles in a certain pattern you'll hear from their lawyers. Nintendo is very slightly more easy going. That's why it's easy to forget.
Why'd they take "Gayroller" off though?
By "emergency sheet" are you suggesting writing the access-to-everything password down somewhere? If so I'm hard pressed to think of many things less secure. If not I'm genuinely curious what it is.
I can't imagine a scenario in which I wouldn't have backups, but I appreciate the mention.
I also am generally not concerned with someone pickpocketing my house keys, but that's not to say it isn't a possibility. Awareness is the first step to mitigation.
Email has to be the most protected, I absolutely agree. But I definitely wouldn't be comfortable with the possibility of needing to reset everything else if I lost my master password. But I don't know that I'm more comfortable with the ability to reset. It really kinda feels lose-lose to me.
I don't think we'll move to passkeys any quicker or easier than we moved to 2FA. I'm glad we're getting better options but we're bound by the weakest links and they don't like change.
Thanks for the answers
I did have a classmate try to replicate Simon in QBasic but he kept needing the input reversed.
I told him the "feature not a bug" line and suggested he call it NOMIS
And Robert Duncan McNeill was not-Tom Paris before he was Tom Paris.
Or was he Nicholas Locarno before later being not-Nicholas Locarno