[-] GrievingWidow420@feddit.it 1 points 4 months ago

I assume it references the song Gdzie jest biały węgorz ? by Cypis

[-] GrievingWidow420@feddit.it 1 points 9 months ago

Whatever you want, man, that's the trick

[-] GrievingWidow420@feddit.it 1 points 10 months ago

How about the good old Danny Trejo?

[-] GrievingWidow420@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

That's exactly right. They won't.

[-] GrievingWidow420@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nevermind, they cancelled my flight today and thus made my decision-making more straightforward. The problem is still there tho

[-] GrievingWidow420@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

They are like a monkey with an automatic weapon that they can use to do stuff to others, but they're not yet sure how and when they are gonna do it

[-] GrievingWidow420@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

If I actually decide to go, I think I'll pay that 55, so that they can have them until they spend them on doritos the following day, but letting them have my face would make them money even the next day and the day after that. Does that sound reasonable? A 55 for me, in this case, is a payment for intel (albeit an undesired one), like in hitman: blood money, to know who is the enemy and who is the friend

[-] GrievingWidow420@feddit.it -1 points 1 year ago

I understand. But if you cannot see the slope of others, how can you be sure?

[-] GrievingWidow420@feddit.it 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. It makes sense to limit everything except thing required to interact with such sites when accessing them, but, as history tells us, not everything served as higher purpose will remain noble and harmless. It definitely has potential to be used against users in the future. Will it? It is very much in line with what Web Integrity API proposed as a "solution".

EDIT: added the last sentence.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

GrievingWidow420

joined 1 year ago