[-] HamFistedVegan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

It shows a really quite astounding lack of self awareness to even think that it's worth having a premier in the UK.

Had she been even remotely aware of how we (I'm from the UK) feel about her husband over here, she would know that this was inevitable.

Her husband is universally despised in this country. Even by the Right.

[-] HamFistedVegan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I believe it will if enough people protest and show how they really feel about everything, including ICE.

You may disagree though.

[-] HamFistedVegan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I think the internet and news media vastly overestimate MAGA's influence on the daily lives of every American.

I'm not saying it's right but it seems to be the only logical explanation for everything.

How else do you look at what's going on and explain that 49% of Americans voted for this?

That's a genuine question. I'm not being facetious.

[-] HamFistedVegan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Didn't they say this last time?

People are starting to realise they're full of it.

[-] HamFistedVegan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I think we're starting to see a shift in foreign policy though. Especially after Davos.

Carnie's speech was powerful. European leaders got Trump to back down (so they think) after organising and preparing a strong, unified response that spooked the markets.

I think they are finally starting to realise that he can't be placated, he isn't going away and that he needs to be stood up to.

Maybe I'm just hopeful.

[-] HamFistedVegan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I think a lot of people are aware but when your elected representatives won't represent you, what do you do?

Personally, and I know this would be very difficult to organise, but I believe the most effective tool ordinary citizens have against Trump is a general strike.

The markets have been shown to be the only thing effective at restraining Trump. He only cares about money.

Workers are what make the economy, not the businesses. They have nothing without the hard work of everyday men and women.

Denying them labour in an organised manner could cripple the entire country.

Look at Britain in the 1970s/1980s or The Russian Revolution.

I'm aware it's very difficult to achieve but I remain resolute in my belief that it is the most effective tool available. By far.

[-] HamFistedVegan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

The Democrats to be talking more about the possibility of election manipulation by the GOP and making the public aware of their intent to fight any such plans, I imagine?

You're right, it's short on suggestions.

The big one in there for me is Voter Tourism.

If Trump and the GOP pass a bill allowing that, it's game over.

The Democrats need to fight that and also I would argue any further changes at all to the electoral system with everything they have.

The article highlight

[-] HamFistedVegan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

How many more people have to be murdered before Congress act?

How many more innocent civilians have to die at the hands of the government before the elected representatives of those people take action?

The USA is descending into an authoritarian state and Congress is letting it happen.

They could end it whenever they want. This on them as well as criminals perpetrating these heinous crimes.

[-] HamFistedVegan@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

The DNC and corporate Democrats would rather have a fascist takeover than empower actual leftwing policies, so I don't think that eventuality really bothers them as much as the possibility of losing control over the power structures of the Democratic party does.

I believe, as I'm sure many of you do, that this is because even though open and fair democracy is at stake here, their wealth is not.

A left wing agenda threatens their wealth. That is clearly the thing they care about most, to the detriment of their electorate.

I think it makes perfect sense for the power structures of the DNC to act like this will be a fair election, the best outcome for them is it won't be and it will thus make the job of leaders in the DNC far easier.

Wow. I consider myself very cynical and but even I never would have thought of it like that. It does make sense though. If they take action now after delaying so long there will be cries of "what took you so long". They need Trump to do something so awful, like abandon democracy completely, that the finger will only ever be pointed at him as the villain.

The US is crying out for competent third party that better represents the electorate. If funding could somehow be secured (massive or even impossible if) then they would surely wipe the floor with the Republicans and Democrats. By now many people surely feel they are no longer represented by either party.

43
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by HamFistedVegan@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

There's a lot to digest here.

The thing that struck me most though was the article mentions was the tactic of allowing voters to place their vote in any state. Voter Tourism, essentially.

As the article mentions - expect something similar from the administration.

If that happens then personally I think that's a huge sign that the mid-terms will be compromised.

Free and fair democracy is so important. It must not be destroyed.

HamFistedVegan

joined 1 week ago