Thats a chicken/egg peoblem. If enough renewables are build the storage follows. In a perfect world goverments would incentivice storage but in an imperfect one problems have to occure before somebody does something to solve them. Anyway, according to lazard renewables + storage are still cheaper than NPPs.
Slow, expensive, riddeled with corruption, long ago surpassed by renewables. Why should we use it?
It wasn't even an accident, he just killed a cyclist because he wanted to drive on a bicycle path without being, rightfully, called out for it. Bonus points for having his child in his car.
"Conservatives" are usually right wing extremists, thats the same everywhere.
There are just better/faster options...
This is happening, to a degree, in most of Europe. Storage is the answer as described in the article. Unfortunately politics are not proactive, you need to break the system before something happens... and now the system is broken, yeah!!!
Love EVs, hate Musk... not sure how to feel :-/
I am pretty sure the EU will soon reach the final phase of the electricity transition. Soon it will be more about balancing the grid with storage and upgrading the electricity network and no longer about build out rates of solar and Wind.
What a giant waste of resources.
Eine deutsche Kleinstpartei versauts für ganz Europa. Mit den Neoliberalen ist kein Staat zu machen.
Nice example of a false equivalency...
Yes, but energy density doesn't matter for most applications and the waste it produces is highly problematic.