'Express yourself' through censorship. Brilliant stuff, folks.
Not if the owners have any character
Listen, we can't all have the bladder control of a perfectly sculpted Greek God - ok?
No I think their point stands. There are plenty of words to choose from, you simply don't need to say shit. Like it is quite literally that simple, use the word or don't.
I want to point out two things
1: She threw up, assuming she doesn't have a pocket dimension in her throat she likely threw up most of the alcohol.
2: OP was almost certainly drinking. OP makes no mention of throwing up. We can pretty safely assume OP is also drunk, and likely has more alcohol still in his system than her.
Seems like a lot of people ITT think that consent is a one way street. He said no and was drunk, she pushed. We can at the very least admit that she sexually assaulted him, and if you think otherwise you need to rethink some things.
I can see what you're saying, but you are making some assumptions and that's entirely due to OP being an unreliable narrator.
Throwing up usually purges a lot of the alcohol from your system. OP makes no mention of throwing up themselves, and I'm assuming they were drinking too. That means there's a solid chance there's more alcohol in OPs system than hers. You do understand that consent works both ways, yes?
Listen, cut him some slack - it's really hard to keep your hands dry when you're writing inside of a bubble. They're very soapy, and you can't move too much or they'll pop.
On the hand other
Maybe he should try his hand at teaching too, it seems like he's got a unique skill for simplifying complicated concepts.
The point they're trying to make is that it's pretty fucking hard finding anything below 20% these days.
I'm a citizen of the United States.
I give you the pass.
Edit: in fact, talk more - specifically to other U.S. citizens about it. Exposure to other countries ways of doing things can only be a good thing, and if they tell you to fuck off - whatever, that's their right.
Fuck no