I'm not in (or into) the JS ecosystem. I'm glad I didn't have to dive into that at work yet. But I've used deno and bun in the past to evade installing NodeJS.
Just now I used deno v2 to build a static website I contributed a fix to, and it worked. I'm very glad to see I don't have to juggle different npm alternatives or be stuck without when I want to contribute but definitely do not want to install NodeJS.
The deno install was hilariously slow downloading and installing the JS libs into the node_modules folder. 150 MB of JS source code. For a simple static website generator.
Comparing it to the hugo.exe binary (go, single binary static website generator): That one is 80 MB. Not having to juggle many files makes it a lot faster and compact of course.
The deno.exe is 107 MB. Which is a chunky size; but man it provides a lot. When you contrast that to the node_modules folder… lol
The announcement also mentions and links to JSR for TypeScript module publishing platform, also with backwards compatibility and automatic stuff generating. Which also seems like a good effort.
Is your suggestion that people should? Isn't Rust the more realistic, effective solution because it forces people to do better? Evidently, "correct memory safety in C/C++" didn't work out.
TOML instead of YAML or JSON for configuration.
YAML is complex and has security concerns most people are not aware of.
JSON works, but the block quoting and indenting is a lot of noise for a simple category key value format.
Study, get a bachelors degree
That's not 6 months though
German-based SUSE just extended long-term support for Linux Enterprise 15 until July 2037. […] 13 years from now […] that’s […] 19 years after 2018, which is when Linux Enterprise 15 was first released.
pretty good
After years of support and collaboration, SUSE asked OpenSUSE to drop “SUSE” - their [SUSE] branding - from their [OpneSUSE] name.
I see you're using your wife as a test user for yourself. Smart.
Gitlab will most likely use it as a big selling point once all the work has been done by externals with little to no cost to Gitlab.
I don't think so. It'd/'ll be a nice feature, and be listed as such. But it's not one of their primary selling points or marketing targets. Federation will be niche. Most useful in the FOSS space that pays little anyway.
Yes, the GPL allows you to make modifications. The GPL still applies.
The cloned repository still holds the history and deleted files. The files that are still there retain the GPL. If you make additions to the GPL sources, the GPL applies to those too. (Copyleft license.)
You can check the summary of GPL on ChooseALicense to understand your rights and conditions a bit better.
Wallet voting doesn't work at that scale. The user base overall doesn't care and doesn't know better.
Those that care making noise and politics regulating works, or can work.