Yes, recognizing there is a wider environmental impact than the fuel your vehicle uses means you must give up all technology. What a reasonable conclusion to take from that comment.

The other comment about a rotation would probably work, but if you want to keep it in the bathroom, get a little grow light for the plant.

Bernie has been nothing but consistent. Selling out to the neolibs and supporting imperialism is nothing new for him. Don't forget how he shilled for Clinton and Biden when he "lost" the nomination to the establishment candidates. He praised the police after George Floyd's murder and praising the ghoul, Jeff Bezos, for raising the wages of Amazon and Whole Foods workers to $15/hour in 2018, only 6 years after the "Fight for $15" began (while they were investing heavily in automation, never improved their labor practices, and indications were that they had always raised wages during similar economic conditions so they could meet their seasonal employment needs, surely Bernie fostered a change in Bezos' empty heart).

Here's a disorganized list of some of Bernie's votes ranging from the early 1990s to the 2020s:

• Voted in favor of H.R. Res. 64 Authorization for Use of Military Force in 2001, giving Bush Jr. carte blanche to use military force against those the US found responsible for 9/11. He continues to support "The War on Terror" by voting in favor of the authorization of additional funds for US military actions in 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008. In March 2003, he voted in favor of a resolution expressing unequivocal support of Bush Jr and the Armed forces for their actions regarding Operation Iraqi freedom. This is an odd choice considering he voted against the authorization of military action in Iraq in 2003, something he like to brag about when in the media spotlight. What good is voting against a war if you are going to repeatedly vote to fund it for years afterwards?

• Voted in favor of the Iraq Liberation Act in 1998. This included economic sanctions that killed up to 500,000 children. This same resolution allowed for direct military action in Iraq (Operation Desert Fox). He had previously voted against the Invasion of Iraq in 1991.

• Voted in favor of the Iran and Libya Sanctions Act in 1996. Then voted to extend these in 2001. This was meant to cripple the ability of each country to develop their own petroleum industries.

• Voted in favor of bombing Kosovo in 1999. This decision led to him quite publicly losing staffers and long-time friends as well as an anti-war protest in his office. I wonder why?

• Voted in favor of sending military hardware and funding to Israel in 1997, 1994, and 2004. In 2006, he voted in favor of economic sanctions against Palestine after Hamas won an elections in order to remove them from power. His support of the Israeli military also extended to their actions in Lebanon in 2006 and Gaza in 2014, but surely that was the end of his support, right?

• Remember that racist, dumpster fire of a movie "Black Hawk Down" which inaccurately portrayed the events that led to the US pulling out of the conflict in Somalia? Bernie voted for that military intervention.

• Supported providing $1 billion in military aid and training to Ukraine in December of 2014. I'm sure all of this was used in defense and none of it contributed to the conflicts that killed civilians from 2015 to today. I'm also sure that Bernie would never again vote to send funding to continue or escalate this war and the suffering it's caused.

• Refused to end the drone program while running for president in 2016 and 2020 as he thinks it's useful and promised that he would use it responsibly if elected.

• Supported military action in Libya, Lebanon, Bosnia, Yemen, Syria, Congo, Haiti, Liberia, and Sudan.

I'm tired of describing how his actions have spoken and I haven't even gotten into his economics and how far removed he is from a socialist on the front too. There's plenty to criticize even if you aren't a socialist or don't expect him to do a socialism.

The point is that any integrity Bernie Sanders had as a revolutionary or leftist was lost decades ago. His radical stances and actions are romanticized now. The only way Sanders is relevant to progressives and socialists these days is how he acted as a catalyst for driving many people in the US further left.

It's shocking how much I have to Google while reading it.

We all go through it, even if it's just learning terms we're unfamiliar with. Your other points resonate with me as well. It can take a lot of effort to work through (because there's so much to read!), but I've also found it's been very rewarding.

Thank you for taking the time to read it. Most people we encounter don't even bother to engage with anything that opposes their established worldview. It's not trivial and requires an inquisitive mind. Many people don't care enough to even try.

Not using a computer also bypasses it.

The article is listed on ResearchGate.

For anyone looking for an alternative to Sci-Hub (the GOAT), you can make a free account on RG and send a request to the authors for a copy of their paper (about two clicks to perform).

Most researchers will send you a copy within a day, maybe two. If you copy the title or the DOI link into a search with "ResearchGate" it usually shows up in most search engines.

It's redditor big-brain posturing.

If you don't want to be called Nazis, then stop putting up with all the fascists in your instance. Pretending the problem doesn't exist is definitely the mature stance to take when someone points out that your instance is harboring fascists.

The barrier of an application is enough to scare off most non-serious users. I used to favor open registration, but after making an account and participating on an instance with open registration vs closed, I found the closed registration shuts down a lot of bad actors and makes the instance a more pleasant community.

I'm not even advocating for rejecting any of the applications, just having questions to answer before joining seems to significantly cut down on the trolls.

To add more: the last chatel slave in the US was freed in 1942. During WWII.

Why? Not because it was the right thing to do, but because the optics of having slaves looked bad and the Japanese Empire (of all institutions) was calling the US out.

People living and running the country to this day fought tooth and nail against the civil rights movement. Slavery is not ancient history, it's part of what's allowed a small portion of the current world population to lead a privileged life.

Index and middle fingers. I never experience fatigue like I would with a thumb-ball mouse. I use the mouse that is one size down from the huge. The Deft Pro I think?

People love to have something to live for, but they end up making work their personalities because they have no time or energy for anything else. Turns out if you give people time to actually build a life, they don't want to go to work constantly.