Sorry, I didn't mean it to sound so aggressive. I wasn't arguing against your statement, just the use of passive language in general to downplay what's going on.
And don't apologize for your English. You speak it well.
Sorry, I didn't mean it to sound so aggressive. I wasn't arguing against your statement, just the use of passive language in general to downplay what's going on.
And don't apologize for your English. You speak it well.
I feel like I should bookmark this picture because it'll probably come in handy.
It's not "a loss of life". Loss of life is from an accident or disaster. It's something that couldn't really be avoided.
This event was an intentional slaughter of innocent human life. It's not "loss of life". It's genocide.
"Microsoft"
Are you my cat? Sometimes he won't stop!
It's more than he can remember.
Oh, my mistake.
That’s the best you got? The other VP candidate wants women to be slaves to their rape babies, but Walz is ~~“too old” for video games~~ giving off "how do you do fellow kids" vibes?
Now I understand how your point is valid and the two are totally comparable.
That's what you're for.
That's the best you got? The other VP candidate wants women to be slaves to their rape babies, but Walz is "too old" for video games?
You're a fucking farce.
Yeah and remember the part from the sermon on the mount where Jesus talks about grabbing women by the pussy? And how when you're the son of god they'll let you do it.
Did you forget that every "responsible" western power also has an arsenal of anti-personnel and anti-vehicle mines which are specifically meant to be hidden and disguised?
This is not true.
That's not hypocritical. That's reaching your target audience.