Do you mean the retweets or actual replies? Because I'm not seeing any replies to his comment, even in xcancel.

The response to his paper in the video seems to imply that, at least in the paper, he is more explicit about AI lacking the requirements of consciousness.

Kind of like saying that humans are car-driving machines because we drive cars.

LLMs and humans are both sentence-producing machines, but they were shaped by different processes to do different work

Except not really. We're not sentence-producing machines, we're "machines" (so to speak) that can produce sentences. Not the same thing.

Once this is in place, they say, nations must be prepared to enforce these restrictions by bombing unregistered data centres, even if this risks nuclear war, “because datacenters can kill more people than nuclear weapons” (emphasis theirs).

So the plan is still to kill everyone to death to prevent GPT-~~5~~ ~~6~~ ~~7~~ ~~8~~ ...

To be frank, all seances are designed to scam the grieving, AI or otherwise. If AI threatens the psychic industry I say let them fight.

"Fund my company and your child might live to adulthood and/or have sperm that glows green."

I still don't know what TESCREAL actually means.