[-] Tosti@feddit.nl 0 points 9 months ago

Sure, if that's your take there is no use further discussing it.

[-] Tosti@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago

Yes, but afaik the hypersonic term applies to weapons over mach 4. NATO also adds additional requirements for hypersonics, such as manourerability. But they have enough speed to qualify.

[-] Tosti@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago

Yes they are, but in this conflict the Russians reconfigured some of them and use them in a ground to ground attackrole.

They had shortages of other tactical weapons and apparently a nice stockpile of these missiles.

[-] Tosti@feddit.nl 0 points 10 months ago

But, if she did the things she did, then it surely is her own fault, no? Or, as long as you are for the right cause, your past disgressions do not matter?

[-] Tosti@feddit.nl 0 points 10 months ago

Yes, erase the history there. That way people are no longer reminded of it either.

Isn't putting a nice statue to the woman (giving her a name and a face) with a plaque explaining why the street has its name not a better solution. Instead of erasing it showing people that some of the things we hold dear don't nessecarilily are because of nice things.

Or actually name the street after the woman's real name (if we know it)

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Tosti

joined 1 year ago