Hi
I'm looking for people who have studied the Moscow trials in more depth
I have studied them through Grover Furr and some other (typically communists) and the idea they were faked is beyond ridiculous
Recently I just bought the entire transcript of the 1938 Moscow trials which I intend to read through and having already skimmed some choice passages the idea of fabricating not one, not two but 3 trials that product damn near 1000 pages of transcripts in front of the worlds press seems beyond ridiculous
So essentially I am wondering if other Comrades see how bourgeois historians have characterised them as fakes?
Edit: Also I read the post here recently about Col Alknis (the grandson of Tukhachevsky who read the transcript of his grandfathers trial and came away convinced his grandad was guilty)
Least favourite person in the world
Imagine going on youtube looking like a fucking terrorist and calling yourself a communist because of such petit-bourgeois fear of "muh corporate job!"
The amount of damage this guy did is phenomenal. Every single person that agreed with him was already an ML and everyone else, if they didn't already, now associated communism with fucking terrorists