[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

Shit guys, the tone police are here! Scatter!

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago

Technical people that move into management usually (but not always) suffer from something I’ve started calling management brain rot. They’re exposed to the spreadsheet warriors and their corporate jargon, and it doesn’t take long for the good ones to give up and the bad ones to thrive in a, let’s call it, “low-information environment.”

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 14 points 2 months ago

We eat him last.

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

Drawbacks are mostly the economics of it. You have to convince people to put time and energy into turning waste into monomers. If the monomers you get from crude oil are cheaper, you’ve got an uphill battle.

The catalysts can be complex, but the good ones are really simple. The zinc one in this article is pretty easy to understand. Ours was an organic molecule, but a really abundant and cheap one. (We could easily recover and re-use the catalyst, too, which I also doubt most of the metal salt catalysts are capable of). Part of the project was optimizing that catalyst. We found ones that worked a little better, but were like 10x as expensive. So we just used a little more of the simple one and figured out how to use it over and over.

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 13 points 4 months ago

Hopefully not as a bunch of really good question posts full of mod-deleted answers.

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 13 points 4 months ago

The labrats subreddit was kinda fun. I’m a chemist, but the chemistry subreddit was overwhelmed by people asking for homework advice, showing off bad caffeine tattoos, and getting upset when they couldn’t talk about drugs or explosives.

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 13 points 5 months ago

Schism incoming in 3… 2…

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago

I’m a person who liked Disco for about a season and a half until it was clear they didn’t have a clue what they were doing. I was pumped for Picard until it turned out to be a dud in reality.

SNW brings back what Trek has been good at: thought-provoking narratives, true ensemble casts, mostly episodic stories. LD takes what I love about Star Trek and makes fun of it in the most loving way possible – and in the process makes some really good “true” Trek episodes.

I can say as someone who shares your opinions of Disco / Picard that SNW and LD (if animated humor would work for you) are worth trying out.

And just… be careful conflating how those old episodes made you feel (and make you feel remembering them) versus how good they were. You want to talk about bad TV? S1 of TNG was a dumpster fire. But we all feel good about it because of where it led to. If bad new stuff can make you feel differently about the old stuff, your feelings about the old stuff might not be rooted in what you think it is.

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 12 points 5 months ago

I had to stare out a window for a little bit after this one.

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 13 points 8 months ago

I went with a self-hosted FreshRSS instance, it has its issues but it works well with the client apps I use.

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

I’m looking forward to the quality-of-life upgrades that come along with the expansion, whether or not I purchase it.

(Of course I’m going to purchase it. >1000 hours for like thirty bucks? I can hand over a few more dollars.)

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Yep. My little Field Notes books don’t send me notifications about emails, and I can toss them around without breaking them. And use a lot of notation and drawing methods that are very slow when typing with my thumbs.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

becausechemistry

joined 1 year ago