[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

The Nobel committees frequently give prizes in an area that really have more to do with other areas. Six of the last ten Nobels in Chemistry have been explicitly biology focused. Two more were materials science stuff, so maybe half chemistry. Only two were what I’d consider actual chemistry.

But this one is pretty rough. The Nobel Prize in Physics goes to setting the world’s energy reserves on fire so coked-up executives’ lines can go up and basement-dwellers can generate waifus with big tiddies. UGH

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

I’m in the middle of a TNG rewatch. This is my next episode. Every time I look at the thumbnail, I just can’t. Even though Best of Both Worlds is so soon after.

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

Usually “I want to help spread class consciousness” means just saying “hurr durr both sides same,” which encourages people not to vote, which historically favors the conservative candidate.

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

Drawbacks are mostly the economics of it. You have to convince people to put time and energy into turning waste into monomers. If the monomers you get from crude oil are cheaper, you’ve got an uphill battle.

The catalysts can be complex, but the good ones are really simple. The zinc one in this article is pretty easy to understand. Ours was an organic molecule, but a really abundant and cheap one. (We could easily recover and re-use the catalyst, too, which I also doubt most of the metal salt catalysts are capable of). Part of the project was optimizing that catalyst. We found ones that worked a little better, but were like 10x as expensive. So we just used a little more of the simple one and figured out how to use it over and over.

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

supports the second amendment

I think we should have a well-regulated militia. But I don’t think that every school child should be able to wield an AR-15. I guess that makes me anti-2nd?

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago

I have a Mac with multiple monitors. It handles them a hell of a lot better than my PC at work.

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago

It’s not AI, it’s PISS. Plagiarized information synthesis software.

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

The cryogens boil off at a pretty consistent rate no matter what, but the recovery/recompression systems do require power. So once power is cut, any boil off isn’t recovered.

Superconducting magnets (like in MRIs) can run effectively forever when at the right temperature. Turning them off requires a complex process of draining off that current slowly and carefully so that the magnet isn’t damaged. Hard to do on a normal day, and profoundly harder if there’s no power.

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

I think the point is that even by the standards of his time, he was horrible. And that was an era where a common legal execution method was strapping you to a wagon wheel and beating you to death over the course of an hour. He was horrible compared even to that.

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Let’s just ignore the partially burned polymers and aluminum and stuff billowing out of the boosters, huh?

Elon is a shithead, but that does not make SLS a good rocket.

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago
  1. Scheduling
  2. Doors
view more: ‹ prev next ›

becausechemistry

joined 1 year ago