Depends on what you do. my daily driver is a $20 x200. works great for my needs. But I don't game

Working on getting all the badges

i mean, chown is just a binary. takeown is probably pretty similar, right?

This is true of other skills too. Sometimes I can remember how to do things only when I stop thinking

It's more like, other animals don't have breasts at all when they aren't lactating. No specific sources to suggest it's sexual selection, I heard it somewhere. I like watching videos about archaeology but it's not my field. Breasts don't really fossilize, so don't think we'll ever know for sure. Idk about nipple size, but yeah too small isn't great.

To clarify, I'm not saying specifically large breasts were selected for but that the fact humans have breasts at all suggests it's at least a secondary sex charactaristic (like beards) and I don't think it benefits fitness in other ways

edit: Probably saying "big tiddies" was not the right way to put that

because grams are small, but 174cm makes more sense than 1.7m

It's true that it's not proven. What is true is that human breasts are weird and no one is sure why. The theory I most support is sexual selection because it looks like it'd be good for feeding babies

Many cultures even today don’t “fetishize” breasts

I didn't say fetishize. Sexual selection just means it ihas informed decisions to mate

surely due to the production of milk that is supportive of the best growth for babies

You'd think this but apparently it's not true. This is why I think it's a sexual selection thing. Some stone age dude probably thought the same thing

if your idea of “sexual selection” was correct, wouldn’t every woman have massive tits

Humans are the only animal that have big tiddies when they aren't nursing.

I don't believe in a Flying Spaghetti Monster either. It's nonsensical. Look at the packages people...

Praise unto the Flying Enriched Maccaroni Product Monster

The sun unix keyboard also swaps ctrl and caps lock

this was well hidden. not sure anyone would have spotted this by checking commit log

No, I was hoping it'd be confirmed when I mentiomed it could be tongue in cheek. Doesn't always come across in a thread where some are unironically making the same point.

oh, he does archeology youtubes and just did a video on "the oldest name". He's pretty cool edit: It was a pretty cool video too. he also asked "oldest name we know a lot about" and "oldest name of a non-royal we know a lot about" in that video