[-] chebra@mstdn.io 8 points 4 weeks ago

@LordCrom @101

> 95% of people don’t know fdroid exists

Exactly, so let's keep talking about F-Droid and recommend it to the 95% of people, shall we?

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 9 points 4 weeks ago

@Melatonin No problem 🙂 Organic Maps is a great client for OSM. And doesn't it feel good knowing that by correcting something through Organic Maps you are taking part in a community of 10M users who together created a 2TB xml file map of the whole planet, free for anyone to download? It's one of the miracles of the free libre world.

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 13 points 4 weeks ago

@Melatonin @MigratingtoLemmy

Not Organic Maps, that's just the client. The data is OpenStreetMap, more info about imports here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 10 points 3 months ago

@danielquinn @Tomkoid That might change very quickly after Gitlab finds a buyer.

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 13 points 5 months ago

@mormund It's not about the privacy of the code, but the privacy of the users clicking on github and then reading some news. They aggregate behavioral data about you.

> the only thing that can be lost are issues and pull request histories

"Only"?? That's a HUGE problem. That's exactly one of the walls keeping people inside github. Git protocol could distribute that, but it doesn't suit the commercial platform's interests -> go to open platforms instead.

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 8 points 6 months ago

@cyclohexane Yes, but.. For many people, the appeal of open source has nothing to do with how easy it is for corporations. So any license that limit "corporate leech" is NOT FOSS because FOSS is about having no such limits. At the same time FOSS doesn't say you can't charge money, because FOSS is NOT about restricting profit.

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 8 points 6 months ago

@cyclohexane @x1gma

> It is about transparency, the ability to contribute, and the community driven product as a result. It is about the ability to pick up the project if the original developer stops using it, even decades later. It’s about the ease of interfacing with said software.

That's... exactly what the FSF and OSI definitions are all about.

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 9 points 7 months ago

@Kushia 🤷‍♂️ I have the opposite situation, nobody I care about is on discord. So discord sucks? See the thing is if one matrix guy wants to talk to one discord guy, one of them needs to install a new app. And I think the world would be better if we all had more free/libre apps and less walled gardens, so I will strongly resist installing discord. Just yet another proprietary walled garden waiting for the rug-pull. Why? Just convince the other guy to use Matrix and over time our world will improve

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 11 points 8 months ago

@willya I'm actually amazed such interoperability works, it just needs better tools for catching the spam.

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 8 points 8 months ago

@otter ouch, so that's even worse than I realized. I'm still getting some spam from the small abandoned M instances but only when it mentions the L name and it looks like even when it gets deleted from L, it still stays on the M side. I have spam posts in my timeline many hours old. This is bad because it looks like the only way to avoid them is to unfollow the community or block all spammers individually by myself.

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 7 points 8 months ago

@xilliah It's not free though. It came with licenses. And LLMs don't have the capability to "study", they are just a glorified random word generator.

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 7 points 11 months ago

@SNFi Woodpecker passed 1.0 recently and it's much better. Try it again.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

chebra

joined 6 years ago