[-] dingdongmetacarples@lemmy.world 355 points 2 months ago

Stop using Twitter

[-] dingdongmetacarples@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago

Abnormally normal

[-] dingdongmetacarples@lemmy.world 74 points 4 months ago

More journalists like this please

[-] dingdongmetacarples@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago

Vote and encourage others to do the same

[-] dingdongmetacarples@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A case would have to be presented to the court. They don't pick and choose cases from nowhere. Cases go from local to state to supreme Court (in general). Assuming the court decides to hear it, their decision would be legally binding. But that only applies to that case. There couldn't and wouldn't be a case of "who won the election", it's decided by the states and is clearly indicated in the Constitution. That's why Trump desperately wanted to "send it back to the states". The state legislatures and governors would be able to muck with the results, but thankfully that didn't happen.

The most important votes are for local officials and don't forget it.

view more: next ›

dingdongmetacarples

joined 1 year ago