What do you mean by "IDLE"? That it's sleeping or hibernating, or that you're just not actively using it? Just because you're not using it doesn't mean it isn't doing anything. Even if you have no apps running, modern operating systems tend to have plenty of background tasks that run periodically.

Open a terminal window, type "top" and press enter. That will show a live view of the processes running in the background (press Q to quit).

Maybe this will help you?

Idk about xinput, but my first assumption is that the reason it doesn't work in some apps is because of Xorg vs Wayland. An evdev based solution should work universally.

Coil whine can come from your power supply, and it's a fairly common phenomenon with low quality ones. I don't think it has anything to do with your OS, unless maybe some background process is increasing power consumption and triggering the issue.

Use top or some other process monitoring tool to see if there's anything running in the background while you hear it making the noise.

The solution would be to replace the part making the noise, whether that's the PSU or something else. It's ultimately a hardware defect.

Or, it could be the new disk(s), too.

I've never heard of an NVME with coil whine, but maybe they increase power consumption enough to trigger the issue? Or having extra disks in the system triggers some periodic background tasks that increase power usage. If you're on Suse, that likely means you're using Btrfs, which tends to do that.

Also, the dev's github profile pic looks like a 12 year old lol

And just imagine how high it could go this year if fucking RAM prices weren't exploding and Steam Machine/Deck/Frame could be sane

I wonder how true that is. The author of this blog post seems to just be taking this guy's word for it. Did Anthropic actually confirm the bug exists by trying to trigger it on real systems, or are they assuming it's real because it looks plausible? The report claims you cam do it with two cooperating NFS clients, so did they actually do that, or are they just assuming it'll work?

I self-host forgejo on a spare machine in my home. I also set up automatic encrypted backup using Restic on Backblaze (but any S3 compatible host will work). It might not be a perfect backup strategy, but it's good enough for me, and perfectly manageable with my limited skills. Using wireguard, I can easily access it from outside my home. I also get much better uptime than Github lol

Importantly, I do NOT share this with anyone. It's purely for my own private development and personal projects (I have a ton of these). Even when contributing to something on github, I work in a mirror on my private forgejo, and only push to github to create the PR when it's ready.

Any open source projects I've released (I only have a few) go on Codeberg, but I still have a lot of projects I contribute to and rely on that are on Github. That's really the hard part: getting other people to migrate to something else.

A bullshit report from commercial CI company peddling AI?!

Sony is a close second, BTW

Do you have any examples? I'm not familiar with any major acquisitions Sony has made. Afaik the "acquire company, fire everyone, and run the business into the ground" strategy is mostly an American phenomenon.

• Eclipse Theia
• Gram
• Lite-XL
• Lapce

I really like this version of the internet. Instead of everyone using a megacorp's giant centralized services, it's better to have a ton of small services made by and for real communities/groups. Git's decentralized nature is a perfect candidate for this, and I hope it takes off more.

So they're saying that the AGPL v3 additional terms for Only office include this:

• the obligation to retain the original product logo
• the denial of any rights to use the copyright holder’s trademarks

How can you retain the original logo if you don't have the right to use their trademarks? (I'm assuming they have a trademark for the logo)

This feels like a sleazy attempt to find a loop hole in the AGPL language to restrict commercial use. Afaik, GPL licenses specifically allow commercial distribution, as not doing so would be a restriction on freedom.

If Only Office doesn't want people to do this, they could have very easily just chosen a different license from the beginning. I find it hard to see them as the good guy here.