It's pretty hit or miss though... I've had lots of good calculations with the odd wrong one sprinkled in, making it unreliable for doing maths. Mostly because it presents the result with absolute certainty.
they are both shit at adding and subtracting numbers, dates and whatnot... they both cant do basic math unfortunately
but github copilot came out right around that time....
yes! this! is chatgpt intelligent: no! does it more often than not give good enough answers to daily but somewhat obscure ans specific programming questions: yes! is a person on SO intelligent: maybe. do they give good enough answers to daily but somewhat obscure ans specific programming questions: mostly
Its not great for complex stuff, but for quick questions if you are stuck. the answers are given quicker, without snark and usually work
the good thing if it gives you the answer in a programming language is that its quite simple tontestvif the output is what you expect, also a lot of humans hive wrong answers...
and copilot and chatgpt give good enough answers without being unfriendly
did you even watch the movie?
tenet was way worse in the sound department, i didn't understand a sinle word, while oppenheimer was ok-ish
just watched it in a barbenheimer combo. the dialogue wasn't as clear as in barbie, but much better than tenet! So still 'nolany' dialogue, but well watchable without subtitles.
According to google it's 642 Light years away. As in, it takes 642 years until the light reaches us. So you probably won't live to see it.
Depending on the type of book you need, libgen.is can be really useful
this