Hmm yep, you’re right. Wasn’t aware of this, funny.
All CLAs aren’t created equal, IMHO. I ain’t a lawyer, but looks to me like K8s’s grants the CNCF a license to the use and patent your code, but you remain the copyright owner. As far as these things go, this one doesn’t look that terrible, at first glance. Or, at least, I’ve seen worse.
Oh I don’t think I’m particularly old, statistically speaking I’ve got about the same amount or a bit more left to go… We just all have those moments that make you realize time flies, don’t we?
Naming is really hard, I can’t blame you haha. I never had to name public facing things, at work I usually advocate for either really straightforward descriptive names or just having fun on a theme (e.g. we had classical music based stuff at one place, like Orchestra, Sonata, Symphony, and pop culture/nerdy stuff at another like Marvel heroes or SW characters, etc). Coming up with a name that’s marketable, discoverable and searchable sounds like a nightmare lol
Oh, yeah. So one’s the limit, the other the actual? Yikes.
What’s wrong with the screenshot? I have no idea what the numbers mean but I’d guess 28min is how long the app was opened, and 20m is how much video was watched?
A Docker Compose is literally just a bunch of Docker commands in yaml format. Can’t say I understand how one can be any easier or harder than the other, considering they basically directly map one to another.
That’s basically my grandma’s macaroni. She adds ground meat. It’s delicious in its own regard.
A 43” is basically a 2*2 grid of 21.5” 1080p displays without bezels. It’s not particularly wide, two average 22-23” 1080p monitors and it’s taking up much more space horizontally. With a deep enough desk, the added verticality isn’t particularly bad either.
However that… thing (?) is another case entirely
I’m actually thinking about grabbing a 43” and get rid of my stack of 34”UW+side by side 23” on top. Would get rid of some head movement. Then you come in with this thing 😂
Zorin, Mint and Pop all are Ubuntu based distros that replace snaps with flatpak by default. I don't know what would make any of those any more difficult than straight up Ubuntu. I'd even argue that most mainstream distros aren't any harder to use than one another. Most of the differences between traditional distributions are behind the scenes: package manager, init system, default applications/configurations...
Even Arch, which has a reputation of being "hard", isn't particularly hard to use. It's the lack of an installer that makes people freak out. The rest is just Linux. Once you plop in a GUI for package management and a proper desktop environment, from an end user perspective, nothing of it is inherently harder.
I don't disagree. Might be dependent on specific drugs/effects? :P
Two questions: