[-] greenman@fosstodon.org 1 points 5 months ago

@Bro666 @kde@floss.social @kde@lemmy.kde.social obviously you like to read what you want to read :)

[-] greenman@fosstodon.org 1 points 5 months ago

@Bro666 @kde@floss.social @kde@lemmy.kde.social better means you do not have to click on thousands buttons to make one thing (just try the text tool in inkscape and come back to see me), ui more intuitive, less bugs

[-] greenman@fosstodon.org 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

@deaf_fish i have never said that ! I totally disagree their abusing methods but it is a different question than claiming does softs listed are as good, bref don't want to troll

[-] greenman@fosstodon.org 0 points 5 months ago

@jabeez @Bro666 I add that I tried scribus, inkscape and darktable.
I know a bit in indesign, a lot lightroom, and a bit illustrator.
I add of course Adobe commercial methods are awful but their softwares far more developed than the foss softwares. This is quite understandable if we think about their means

[-] greenman@fosstodon.org 0 points 5 months ago

@Bro666 @kde@floss.social @kde@lemmy.kde.social the same method used to affirm you can replace Adobe softwares by the listed softs

[-] greenman@fosstodon.org -1 points 5 months ago

@kde@floss.social @kde@lemmy.kde.social If only you were right, but be serious the quality of Adobe softwares is 300 % better than any soft you cite.

greenman

joined 2 years ago