You've based your perception of China on fundamentally incorrect axioms, so there's no discussion to be had here. We can talk about radiation if you want.

A good question is “with what rocket?”

Probably Yenisei which unfortunately had its development paused.

A factor in this crash is that they lack a round-the-world comm system.

They've had this with GLONASS for over a decade. For far-side communications, you need a single relay satellite like what China used for Chang’e-4. However, you don't actually need either of those for many lunar missions. When the Americans sent humans to the moon, they just used radio waves that were picked up from various ground stations across the world.

Lol. The actual reason they use it is they needed a standard time and thought it would be the funniest one considering the Allegations™

Topics can be forbidden while still allowing for a free society. It's called the paradox of tolerance and is why Germany bans the free speech of Nazis. The thing about satire of Islam is that the events that get a big reaction like this are not "making fun of Muslims and Islam" but flat-out hate speech. Look at real political cartoonists like Eli Valley and Stan Kelly to see that you can joke about and even be kind of mean to people without calling them pedophiles or burning sacred books. You say that Islam hasn't had time to become compatible with modern society. What a ridiculous statement contradicted by your own exception. The rise of American Christian fascism as well as the arch-conservative Christians in modern-day Uganda prove that time has nothing to do with how strict a religion is. This is further contradicted by Islamic society being much more progressive in the Medieval era compared to Christian society despite being younger. The fact is, you just hate Muslims.

German spotted. Shouldn't you be a bit more careful about inciting hatred towards religious groups?

You're being quite ridiculous. Here is the full transcript for anyone who cares. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/european-diplomatic-academy-opening-remarks-high-representative-josep-borrell-inauguration_en

As for you, well, enjoy your racist garden.

I know. I am not sure why I am trying to have a discussion with someone arguing in bad faith.

Ad hominem. Please engage the actual content

Sure, in 2021 voters voted for 65 members of the RCCK for the 13th National Committee of CPPCC.

You know that your remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But you are amusing yourself, for it is your adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since they believe in words. You delight in acting in bad faith, since you seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. You are completely aware of the absurdity of your reply.

Dear haters: you claim to hate socialism yet you post on SOCIAL media. Curious!

Green hydrogen via electrolysis of seawater without desalination? That actually sounds quite impressive.

The technology costs as little as 11.2 yuan (US$1.57) per kilogram (2.2 pounds) of hydrogen – much less than the current mainstream cost of hydrogen production from natural gas, which ranges from 20 to 24 yuan per kilogram.

This sounds too good to be true! I wonder how it compares to other fuel-equivalents...