[-] isaiah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Not just you! I'm looking for the link as well, and looks like it's just an image.

[-] isaiah@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think I've learned to get less attached to opinionated terminology in code and database design because I see it happen all the time where the usage of the value/field/thing can evolve naturally over time as the business needs evolve. And refactoring field names (as an example) from UI to database is often a painful exercise, not without significant regression risks. (Depending on the size and complexity of your systems, of course)

So while I totally agree with you and others that ideally naming would be consistent throughout, my real world experience with the issue has taught me that this isn't the hill I die on.

My 2 cents from 10 years experience in the industry.

[-] isaiah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Interesting - my company largely maxing out at Java 9, I often forget about how far Java has come now that it's working on v21 😳

[-] isaiah@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Same here. I'm a Tech Lead right now, but I still live in the code. I see myself as on-trajectory to Architect. I have no direct-reports or any of the responsibilities they go with direct-reports. That role is called a Team Lead at my company (which is on-trajectory for management). I stay at from that stuff like the plague 🤮

isaiah

joined 1 year ago