Are you being sarcastic? Their source really is objectively better, so it's hard for me to tell. There's nothing wrong with believing a doctor, but when you're presented with new info from a reliable source (in this case an entire group of doctors funded by the Australian government and internationally recognized) then maybe just like...say thank you and reevaluate your position?
The tea party movement wasn't grassroots at that point as it was being funded almost entirely by billionaires and groups like Americans for Prosperity. What you're saying here is almost the exact opposite of reality.
jaywalker
joined 1 year ago
Sib is what you're looking for