1
YSK that Elena Kostyuchenko is one of the bravest person in the world. (arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com)
submitted 6 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) by kwero@sh.itjust.works to c/youshouldknow@lemmy.world

Elena worked for Novaya Gazetta, the last independent newspaper in Russia.

Her newsroom was systematically harassed. She has been arrested and beaten on many occasions. In fact, 4 of her colleagues were murdered under her watch.

After Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the newspaper was forced to shut down.

She left Russia and moved to Ukraine where she started covering Russian war crimes committed against civilians. She was forced to leave after Ukrainians told her that Russian soldiers had a bounty on her head. (you can use subtitles)

Then, a few weeks later, she was hospitalized. Her food was poisoned in an attempt to kill her:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/12/you-may-have-been-poisoned-how-an-independent-russian-journalist-became-a-target

https://www.dukechronicle.com/article/duke-university-elena-kostyuchenko-russian-journalist-in-exile-visiting-professor-poisoned-kremlin-20251124

Elena miraculously survived and kept reporting.

She now teaches at Duke University in the US. When asked if she is afraid, she said the following:

https://english.elpais.com/international/2025-11-22/elena-kostyuchenko-im-not-afraid-if-i-wasnt-afraid-of-putin-i-wont-be-afraid-of-trump.html

Elena is one the bravest person I know.

When you think about it, people living in Western Democracies have no excuse. You can create a labor union in your company. You can run for office in your town. You can fight big corporations to reduce pollution.

When I lack inner strength to do the right thing, I always think about her.

6
10
submitted 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) by kwero@sh.itjust.works to c/australia@aussie.zone
48
[-] kwero@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

A US corporation thinks it's more legitimate than the Parliament of Australia.

1
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) by kwero@sh.itjust.works to c/youshouldknow@lemmy.world

Participants were measurably happier and less anxious.

But, disappointingly, not by a huge margin:

Perhaps this is due to the fact a significant number of users switched to less harmful online platforms and didn't stop using their phones.

Or perhaps there is actually something more sinister. My real concern with this study is the involvement of Meta.

We actually have evidence that Meta halted internal research about social media:

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/meta-buried-causal-evidence-social-media-harm-us-court-filings-allege-2025-11-23/

Would you study tobacco and have tobacco companies involved?

Would you study obesity and have Coca-Cola involved?

I don't want to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but could Meta actually bully/bribe Stanford in order to change the figures?

1
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by kwero@sh.itjust.works to c/mentalhealth@lemmy.world
1
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by kwero@sh.itjust.works to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
1
1
23
1
1
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by kwero@sh.itjust.works to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
view more: next ›

kwero

joined 3 days ago