[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml -1 points 17 hours ago
[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml -1 points 17 hours ago

Beep boop how did you figure out my hidden identity? 🤖. Get real

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml -3 points 17 hours ago

I don't follow this guy. I found him to be a pussy when the French government arrested him. I'm sharing the news as it relates to privacy and your very smooth brain may not have grasped it yet, but this is a small victory for spreading the corruption of these governments that are trying to censor information.

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 0 points 17 hours ago

True. It is a trust thing. Thats why I don't trust telegram for privacy. But I use it to follow groups

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 0 points 17 hours ago

https://theconversation.com/youtubes-paedophile-problem-is-only-a-small-part-of-the-internets-issue-with-child-sexual-abuse-94126

Look up the rest yourself. Google hides most of the news about it. So they are useless to search it up

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

In business I am cut throat and I see this as an opportunity to migrate a huge percentage of googles (app store) customers to F-Droid.

In order for this to be possible F-Droid is going to have to spend the next 2 years campaigning against google as a more liberating alternative; which it already is. If the customers aren't all at the heels of google they should care and shift over. Android was not created by and is not a google product,, so they can't truly enforce the developer or side loading thing if a good percentage of the market gets an alternate non google android.

If I were F-Droid creating my own spin of android (basically stock with F-Droid bulit in) would be my main objective currently

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 2 points 19 hours ago

https://support.signal.org/hc/en-us/articles/4850133017242-Twilio-Incident-What-Signal-Users-Need-to-Know

That is a compromise of privacy. If those hackers used those phone number to access any account by using unique methods those users privacy would be utterly lost.

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 1 points 19 hours ago

He was arrested because he didn't stop people from having freedom of speech. He wasn't and hasn't been found guilty of anything.

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago
  1. Strip away the metadata of your photos and documents when sharing them

Is underrated and extremely useful. Good post

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

I agree 99% (only disagreement, those people aren't our masters, they are our enemies)

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

2FA helps with security concerns, not privacy concerns. They still would have your number. Also about Google, they have one of the widest spread and utilized 2FA authentication applications out there.

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Because it has become extremely popular, that's just how it goes. At one point, even Telegram was recommended for being super secure or private, but the privacy is mild on Telegram at best.

But by comparison to Instagram or Whatsapp, it's how the gram looks like Privacy Central, so it was recommended. Now, Signal is replacing that role.

Signal is more private than the sus apps like IG, Facebook, etc. Yes. But only because those apps are so bad.

1

I am a privacy supporter. I believe you get to know your information to the extent you want to know it and that others should only know what you allow them to know about your information.

Saying that, I will say that even more than the dislike I have for the companies stealing people's data, I have even more for the customer who tolerates it.

I posted to a privacy group that you need to "read the terms of services." Instead of learning and gaining a responsible mindset as a consumer. People had the nerve to get mad lol. If you don't read the terms of services that ironically in most cases tell you they are taking your data and using it for shit you wouldn't like or agree with, how can you get mad?

You wouldn't even become a victims if you read it because you would already be aware of the reality. I find that to be so ignorant of customers it almost (but doesn't) warrant the 1984 practices being used against them.

If we stopped supporting this shit it CAN'T happen. So remember If you don't demand privacy you get no privacy

-13
submitted 3 days ago by lunatique@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

In order to protect your privacy even more efficiently, you need to do something very simple whenever using an online service or a software. Something that most people fail to do is reading the terms of service, also known as a TOS, from companies or developers' software. This usually will tell you straight up whether they're spying on you, selling your data, or using it to sell ads. This will solve a lot of problems with people not realizing that some software is actually the opposite of privacy, but they keep using it thinking it enhances their privacy.

21
submitted 4 days ago by lunatique@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Whatever you interpretation of society is.

11

This is something that should get more attention, but it's hard to produce semiconductors that have this effect without being super super cold. It's called quantum levitation but it's not actually levitating. It is locked in the magnetic flux. Which is even more impressive if you ask me.

38
submitted 6 days ago by lunatique@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

No not tired of Trump or Biden but the whole government. The incompetence overall. Please don't harp on one of the presidents all day. BOTH SUCK. In fact if you look real hard you'll realize all of them sucked

view more: ‹ prev next ›

lunatique

joined 1 week ago