[-] manos79@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

sorry for late response.

well,is it not true that the entity who denies the right of existence to the other side has been Israel?

is it not true that Israel is a terrorist state by any definition of the word?

and is it not true that Hamad is truely something which if it did not exist, Israel would wish it existed?

and is it not true that that which Israel wishes for, Israel gets?

what are your thoughts on these?

[-] manos79@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

it seems you can't be bothered with any thing more than 2 lines of stereotypical rhetoric.

[-] manos79@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

i understand you are well intentioned but really also simplistic and generic. what you have said can apply to any conflict just changing the names.

the world through the UN resolutions has clearly indicated who is the oppressor and violators of human rights.

it is the state of Israel itself.

manos79

joined 1 year ago