I know you mean sovereign citizens, but reading "sovcit" my first thought goes to Eastmeg One (and my second thought goes to Eastmeg Two, obviously).

They removed the citation, but did they keep the definition?

Any content is good content as long as it creates payments in the paywall. And that must be what science is all about.

I think Viktor in "Viktor builds a bridge" can serve as a role model. A cliff, a shack and a sea bird as companion.

Just learn from Viktor's mistake. Don't build a bridge.

No, This is shit: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cE4lpSFNFUE

(Actually it is quite good. The linked tune that is. Not the book.)

From what I have read, it can be a support as long as:

• It is trained on local data, from the machine and procedures normally used.
• The accuracy is regularly tested (because any variation in the indata, whether from equipment or procedures changes the input data).
• It is understood as a tool that gives suggestions for the radiologist, not a replacement.

Of course, it cannot be better than the best radiologists around. So the question is if it is worth it, compared with for example hire more staff.

What benefits did the Longtermist stuff on pandemics do in the actual pandemic?

If, as I suspect, it was of no benefit, it belongs in the same pile as hindering the acasualrobotgod.

And poorly at that. Intelligence is a mugs game, if you put your genetic points towards longevity you can keep your initial crowd of scientist/explorers as research leaders longer, which gives a bigger boost to research and more advantages.

At least until the robot god restarts the simulation and/or Paradox releases a new patch.