[-] nrabulinski@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

The person I replied to specifically said

Therefore, in technical discussions, I use the word "Linux" to refer to the OS, as "this software is compatible with Linux". But, when I want to stress out software freedom, given a large influence of the GNU project, I say "GNU/Linux".

So they use GNU/Linux to refer to any open system

[-] nrabulinski@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

So calling those which are just as open but not associated with GNU GNU/Linux is disingenuous, despite the influence of the GNU organization

[-] nrabulinski@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

There’s quite a few Linux distributions or whatever you want to call it that aren’t associated with GNU or are not based on GNU software

[-] nrabulinski@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s not more accurate with distros like gokrazy, alpine, or chimera which aren’t necessarily based on GNU software (the last of which specifically advertises itself as „non-gnu Linux”)

[-] nrabulinski@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Are we calling 1.8.9 old now?

[-] nrabulinski@beehaw.org 44 points 1 year ago

Almost as if current models are fancy token predictors with no reasoning about the input

nrabulinski

joined 1 year ago