It depends on which "them" is being referred to in OP's comment. Assuming "them" are the protesters, then the answer provides what the protesters said, or at least what the organisation they represented said.
they're playing a silly game for attention without caring about the consequences
They're playing a silly but very serious game for attention, the same silly game that politicians and corporate PR departments play. And the protesters seem to care a very great deal about the consequences.
In the past, the common response to the idea was, "So, rocks are conscious?" This argument was meant to illustrate the absurdity of panpsychism.
To me, this response does not illustrate any absurdity in panpsychism.
Adam Baldwin
Ah! I thought it looked like Bill Paxton, I was close :-)
Who's the guy wandering in on the right? It doesn't look like Mitchell?
No. The bits that make it Sailfish, the UI, are proprietary.
Presumably they equate changing desktops with "reinstalling".
Bigots
Snigger
Pot calling the kettle black.
If you had any evidence
ROFL didn't it occur to you how ridiculous that would sound coming from someone defending religious people?
You've introduced the idea of corporations here. Immersive_Matthew never mentioned corporations, profit or elites. I don't know why you've done that. This is a straw man.
How on Earth did the woman "uncover" a mass grave? No details at all in the article. Typical BBC crap.