[-] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 4 months ago

You have no idea what I'm good or not good at. Nor could you from this very limited exchange. You just want to find a reason to dismiss what I've said so that you can remain unchallenged in your bubble where you're saving the world and other people are the problem.

[-] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 4 months ago

spiritualism

"spirituality" 🙄

[-] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 5 months ago

Because the world's problems can't be solved with money.

[-] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 6 months ago

Nice one, thanks

[-] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

My friend's daily driver is a PinePhone. So usable as a daily driver.

[-] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Do you use a lemmy client?

Yes.

I think most of them let you set a block/filter.

I use Jerboa and I can't find any facility to block or filter a community's posts by text.

[-] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 8 months ago

the point I'm making is that whenever campaigners like Jacob Rees-Mogg talk about "sovereignty", he's referring to what the book mentioned

And the point I'm making is that you're wrong.

[-] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They were going for the type of sovereignty in William Rees-Mogg's book "The Sovereign Individual"

I've read that book and it is entirely unrelated to Brexit. The sovereignty the Brexiteers were seeking is also entirely unrelated.

[-] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You mean like the houses where they live?

Teenagers usually don't have houses of their own. Usually they live with their parents and don't want to get high around their parents.

They all actually do have some place to go

Where? Where could teenagers take nitrous oxide together and without their parents? As far as I know, society provides no such spaces.

[-] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

What you're asking is like proof that I've made this comment

No. What I'm asking for is links or references to the material which you used to form your opinion. Not necessarily all of it but at least something which supports what you're saying. That's what's meant by the word "sources" in this context.

proof is you just need to observe the facts he uses

I'm asking you where I can observe his uses.

listen to his arguments

I'm asking you where I can listen to such arguments.

[-] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

LOL this is what constitutes "news"?

[-] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is valid.

Doesn't look like it from here.

Full CMYK support (Gimp finally got a working version last year and it still has a bit of work to do to get it to Photoshop's quality)

I don't know why CMYK support might be important but this seems to be the only technical concern and you've stated that GIMP has working versions with support. shrug

Working with Raw and PSD files. Tight integration with other software to be updated 1:1 without saving and loading a file.

This isn't about design, this is about interoperability. You're just talking about network effects, nothing to do with the software itself.

It's really not reasonable to say "just move to gimp."

That's not what I said. What I said was: it's not reasonable to say you can't earn a living as a professional designer using GIMP.

when specifically the OP said, "these do not work for the industry I am in." So respect that.

But I know people in the design industry who use GIMP, that's the whole point. I don't respect what OP is saying about that because it contradicts my experience. I respect my own experience much more than other people's words. Especially when they seem to be woefully uninformed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

rah

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF