[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Oh. When I said "the west" I was squarely pointing the finger at France. China is playing the longer game there because Russia has stationed Wagner down there already. It benefits both Russia and China if the population is focused on removing French influence. China gets a long term investment hedge against France and Russia gets more cheap mercs for Ukraine.

Now, I don't really want to spend much time doing a full research project on what is basically a game of thrones'ish style side bet. It's insanely complicated, I would imagine. After a few African countries went full-on coup d'état a few months ago, I realized there was much more going on.

Edit: I wasn't downvoting you. I suspect that some people might be trying to launch some instability of their own. Lulz.

[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

The politicians are fine. China probably just bribes them in foreign currency and they sign the deal without even blinking at the interest rates. (Chad has a corruption index of 20 out of 100 with Senegal just a little better at 43.)

[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago

We can both be right.

I chuckled a little when I read that: "Thats not how social media is supposed to work..."

I was supposed to get popcorn, and you two were supposed to fight it out over the next 12 hours arguing about the same thing without realizing it. Pfft. There went my entertainment.

(Obviously, I jest.)

[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago

I have no comment on this particular political topic, but posting statistics without a source reference is bad form. Maybe it's not "lying" but it's misleading, intentional or not. Yes, you did post a source in proper context after you were challenged but it ended up making your original comment look worse. That is my opinion looking from the outside.

If you post data, just cross reference it a couple of times to reduce any friction later. Or don't. You do you.

[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago

I remember they finally were able to make a ball point pen all by themselves in 2017.

When I actually start seeing products that aren't contaminated with fake ICs or are actually grounded properly without hyper-strict foreign supervision, I'll change my tune. Until then, there isn't an article in the world that will convince me that China is actually innovating or taking steps to make quality products.

[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

There is a bit more history behind TSMC. You left out the bits where they partnered with other companies, like Philips, that gave them access to proprietary information. They continued building relationships with other large companies and investing back into their own business.

China isn't doing that. China has had access to older fab equipment for years but still fails to truly innovate. If US companies could trust China enough not to steal modern tech, there could be some real benefits to having fabs in China. The world kinda figured out never to send proprietary information to China years ago. Companies still do and doesn't take long for a thousand clones to pop up on Ali Express shortly after.

[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago

Trains are one thing, modern chip fab is a completely different. Buying older equipment is not going to get them anywhere but into the production of chips that have been on the market for 10 years already.

This is one industry where each generation has hard limits for manufacturing.

[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 days ago

But they are buying mature-node equipment, says the article. That doesn't mean shit other then more cloning and counterfeiting.

[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago

Mastodon. (It was fun!)

[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 47 points 4 days ago

All days are cat days.

[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 19 points 6 days ago

Veritasium just explained some math about voting that covers quite a bit: https://youtu.be/qf7ws2DF-zk?si=R1wIgNC-Q4vsgVd8

274
My Lemmy Rule (lemmy.ca)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by remotelove@lemmy.ca to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Edit: The above Connect filter only works for title posts. It doesn't seem to filter comments or community names.

I mention this only because of some questions here and how people are going to the effort to censor out comments on this post.

37
53
submitted 6 months ago by remotelove@lemmy.ca to c/askscience@lemmy.world

Tectonic activity bends rocks all the time, even hard ones like granite. That takes a ton of heat, pressure and time. It also makes sense that in the right conditions, sheets of rock simply don't have the room to shatter so they must bend.

Have we been able to do the same in a lab and would it have any commercial use? Bending a random bit of hard rock would be an interesting novelty, for sure.

49
submitted 6 months ago by remotelove@lemmy.ca to c/askscience@lemmy.world

I am creating a simulation to evolve simple, multi-cell organisms. (Just for fun!)

Neural networks are fairly easy to evolve, even more so when it's done by random mutations and not actual training. Build an ANN at random and introduce mutations with every generation. The ANNs that accomplish simple goals (by pure chance) live to duplicate with every evolutionary cycle. Fairly easy stuff.

I am stumped when it comes to creating something that would simulate the genes that represent a body. After some reading today, there isn't much info on how cells form into specific shapes for arms, hands, organs, etc. (I am sure there is a ton of data, but I don't know what subject to Google.)

Genes can create the patterns for specific chemicals and cells. How to cells then develop into functional body parts? What makes a heart the shape of a heart?

I think that having a better understanding of that concept can help me develop a framework for physical evolution, even if it as a very tiny scale.

(Putting the ANN in charge of controlling those different body parts is also easy. It's just a matter of allowing those physical traits to evolve first.)

153
30
4
submitted 7 months ago by remotelove@lemmy.ca to c/privacy@lemmy.ca

Curtains forcing‌‌‌‌‍‍‍ their‌‌‌‌‍‬‬‍ ‌‌‌‌‍‬‌will‌‌‌‌‍‬‌ against the ‌‌‌‌‌‬‌‌wind,‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‬‬‌ children‌‌‌‌‍‬‬‍ ‌‌‌‌‍‌sleep,‌‌‌‌‌‬‌‌‌‌‌‌‍‬‍ exchanging‌‌‌‌‍‬‍‍ dreams‌‌‌‌‍‍‌ with‌‌‌‌‌‬‌‌ seraphim. The city drags‌‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‬‌‍‌‌‌‌‍‍‬‌‌‌‌‍‬‍‍‌‌‌‌‍‬‍‌ itself awake ‌‌‌‌‌‬‌‌on subway straps‌‌‌‌‍‬‬‍; and I, an alarm, awake‌‌‌‌‍‬‬ as‌‌‌‌‌‬‌‌‌‌‌‌‍‌‌ a‌‌‌‌‍‬‍‍‌‌‌‌‍‬‍‌‌‌‌‍‬‍‌‌‌‌‍‬‍‌‌‌‌‌ rumor of war, lie stretching into dawn, unasked and unheeded.

10
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by remotelove@lemmy.ca to c/ksp@lemmy.world

Eyyy! My boy Bradley Whistance popped back up on the YouTubes.

422
submitted 8 months ago by remotelove@lemmy.ca to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
209
submitted 10 months ago by remotelove@lemmy.ca to c/memes@lemmy.ml
33
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by remotelove@lemmy.ca to c/3dprinting@lemmy.world

Prusa dun good with this surprise update.

Modified MINI: Revo hotend + Bondtech extruder

Side notes (will add more as I test this firmware):

  • The pre-sliced benchy from Prusa is a bit of a hack. While it does showcase the new speeds, you are not going to get the best performance when you slice it in Prusa Slicer. The new printer profile is good, but it is absolutely in alpha. (I amended a comment below where I was moving all settings to max.)

  • Factory Prusa profile for IS, only uses 0.4mm nozzles (I have been using 0.6mm nozzles exclusively for a while now)

  • If your belts are still stock, order new ones now. The stress that is getting put on the belts now is a little more extreme. (FYI: There was an error in the F1 x-gantry stop where it might wear the belt excessively, so look close.)

  • I have properly packed all the bearings in the printer with grease so they are not as noisy as they would be stock. Be prepared for bearing noise, is what I am saying.

  • Faster printing is causing ~-2°C drift on my REVO nozzle. That is expected and might be able to PID tune for better stability. It's not bad, just something of note.

  • "BonkersBenchy" was sliced with Prusa 2.6.2a. and accelerations are set at 8000mm/s^2. There are other subtle changes in the gcode that affect total print speeds, so dig into them if you need mor fasts.

  • The printer compensates OK when the print speed is manually set to 255 (absolute max). Your top layer bridges are going to have a rough time. It may work or, your print will be ripped off the bed because the first top layers aren't exactly studio quality. (I should say it adjusts to max speed better than it did with older firmware.)

38
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by remotelove@lemmy.ca to c/diablo@lemmy.world
  • We added even more pointless legendary items that won't drop after level 30
  • Legendary items now have an increased chance to roll stats that would only work on your other characters
  • The stash from every character across all Battle net games from every player will now be loaded into memory (Player have been asking for an improved stash since D2, so we are happy to deliver.)
  • Seasons will introduce more bugs that will be quickly fixed with patches that contain more bugs
  • Infinite CC will now be replaced with random suicides. All spells now have a 5% chance to kill you.
  • Your battle pass token rewards dropped from 666 to 333
  • Dozens more useless unique items will be included that you have zero chance of ever getting. We worked hard on this one.
  • You now get to pay yearly for promised improvements we will absolutely never deliver on
  • Sorcs can now teleport completely out of the open world. Previously, this was limited to teleporting inside of walls and under the ground.
  • Barbarians are getting removed. We are replacing the barb with a paladin that is so broken, you will be begging for your Barb back.
  • All useless skills will be buffed 200%
  • We are including gem stacking! Since you really don't need more than 20 gems per character, have zero sell value and have tons of weird stats, we wanted to give players a way to collect thousands of them.

Blizzard would never be as successful as it is without community feedback! Thanks for giving us loads of creative suggestions that we will never, ever implement.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

remotelove

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
196