[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Also mean more commercial distros. Less donations to BSDs projects.

And it also increase the strength of Apple and Google, do you want to see that?

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

I dont know what you mean by privacy projects spreading dirty JS

They are using js in their websites

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

I personally think it is trash..

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Their kernel is just fine.

It is just fine, yeah. The things that restrict what the user can do is the interfaces.

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Can I partition /home directory in a different drive and still fuction?

Only windows can't. Partitioning is recommended.

Best way to partition my / and /home directories?

You should also partition /usr, /var, /opt (if you use) and /usr/local (this hierarchy is not much used on Linux, keep it small). This gain you security and stability (do your own research if you are going to complain here).

On BSD the kernel is located on / so / should be at most 1G. On Linux the kernel is located on /boot and /boot is usually 500M, but there isn't a reason to have a huge / partition when you have partitioned /usr, /var, and /home

I simply want to seperate my / and /home without anything extra. How would I best go about that?

This is ambiguous.

The guy who use a huge single root partition (with a /home) are actually windows' user. / is C: and /home is D:

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

What feature?????

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

I mean Chimera is using FreeBSD userland, and they expressed why GNU coreutils used by most distro have "problem". Since we are talking about BSD. (OpenBSD's userland is less in feature and it is cleaner)

(so that's bring an advantage in security lol)

While coreutils may seem lightweight enough to not cause any issues already, there are some specific reasons the system uses a BSD-derived userland. The primary one is probably that the code of the BSD versions is overall much cleaner and easier to read. There are no cursed components such as gnulib, the codebase is leaner, and more aligned with the project’s goals.

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

ubuntu -> kali -> lubuntu -> debian -> rhel -> arch -> gentoo + alpine -> alpine (-> openbsd + freebsd)

I consider things not in brackets 100/100 trashes (alpine is 1/2, gentoo is 3/4), in experience (because they don't help me to learn anything, I'd take openbsd on platform that X11 support is broken, for example Alpha, than anything not in brackets on amd64. Of course, that should be a personal machine for learning.)

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Sorry, I thought the comment were by the AMDIsOurLord guy

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

I appreciate that they are blobfree but “no copyleft” has nothing to do with that

Blobs that are redistributable is still included. The 0x things are redistributable under BSD 3 clause license, with an additional clause prohibiting reverse engineering

Which is much free than the gpl

Actually, I think Copyleft Linux could not include blobs?

What??

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

I'm curious what's the advanced feature?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

scratchandgame

joined 8 months ago