[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Compared to Windows or MacOS, yes, it is very techy.

Distros that have so much graphics like ubuntu and their linux mint isn't (much) :)

there's a guy even claimed "Linux is almost identical to Windows". That guy is a "masturbing monkey" that cannot care about anything other than privacy.

but Linux simply is not for everyone

correct. I think Torvalds would agree.

Many people have no concept of a computer, offer them running linux is destroying their business and render them jobless

And these guys are so hilarious: switching to linux but want to use windows app with wine !

Switching to linux only to decorate the desktop and neofetch!

They want to switch but never want to learn what a kernel is.

Switching to linux and claim about "free", "open source" but they hide their proprietary games

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

My own opinion, won't fit with post like this

Stop telling people it’s ‘tech-y’ or acting like you’re more advanced for using it, you are scaring away people

So lucky that OpenBSD never cared if anyone used the operating system or not

The operating system is for developers, to fit developers' need

That’s it, spread Linux to as many people as possible. The larger the marketshare, the better support we ALL get

the better support for single root partition... UNIX have a removable filesystem, you can use different partition for / and /usr and /usr/local and /var and /home but hardly any distro can offer that. They all use a single root partition for everything just like windows use a single C:. Spliting /home is just like spliting D:

quality is better than quantity... look at the current state of linux communities (and distros too!) make me switched to BSD

10 person knows how to code python or DOS' C (Turbo C, obsolete) might be better than 100 person that use linux like they would use windows (but think themselves smart)

And if everyone is going to use wine then you should use Windows instead. I think it is much more stable and secure to run windows apps natively

  1. copy down your windows product key

can't drop windows entirely? h-

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Can you complain with them

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

What feature?????

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

I mean Chimera is using FreeBSD userland, and they expressed why GNU coreutils used by most distro have "problem". Since we are talking about BSD. (OpenBSD's userland is less in feature and it is cleaner)

(so that's bring an advantage in security lol)

While coreutils may seem lightweight enough to not cause any issues already, there are some specific reasons the system uses a BSD-derived userland. The primary one is probably that the code of the BSD versions is overall much cleaner and easier to read. There are no cursed components such as gnulib, the codebase is leaner, and more aligned with the project’s goals.

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

+1, but OpenBSD can enforce security (Linux have landlock, *san, ACL, MAC but cannot enforce them, while OpenBSD doesn't but can enforce pledge and unveil and even for some ports like chromium and firefox)

https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/

But see Chimera Linux.

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

FreeBSD's boot speed is just behind arch a little bit (on HDD).

But Windows 8 (with fast startup) on an core 2 duo machine with 1G of RAM boot faster than any debian, ubuntu. (the boot speed decrease when you upgrade hardware lol :) )

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

ubuntu -> kali -> lubuntu -> debian -> rhel -> arch -> gentoo + alpine -> alpine (-> openbsd + freebsd)

I consider things not in brackets 100/100 trashes (alpine is 1/2, gentoo is 3/4), in experience (because they don't help me to learn anything, I'd take openbsd on platform that X11 support is broken, for example Alpha, than anything not in brackets on amd64. Of course, that should be a personal machine for learning.)

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Some distro install and enable services that you would never use. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (and Fedora?) enable the cups printing daemon (I never do printing on Linux and I use a canon lbp 3300, I have to install drivers on windows). Ubuntu enable the openvpn service which "newbies" would never use.

But none of them have tmux installed by default, while OpenBSD have tmux, if I recall correctly NetBSD too

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Why? It'd be better to hide post at -5

Duolingo forum do that.

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Is WinRAR free to use? (is it free software?!)

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

It is amusing that you guys cannot fork the project and remove the feature, while the software is "open source". But arguing about privacy & security & "F(L)OSS" like you are the god.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

scratchandgame

joined 8 months ago