It seemed like it would work for me. The user experience is pretty different than Discord, but I caught onto it pretty quick. There are public servers you can join to see what it could be like. When you launch the desktop client, there is a "popular servers" section on the home page that lets you pick from a couple different community servers. I joined the "Official TeamSpeak Community Server" and then just jumped into the Counter-Strike channel and played around, tested streaming, chat, etc.

To be clear this is the TS6 client, not TS3.

As far as I can tell you can't actually test creating your own server before you pay for a community, although the cost is cheap ($5 USD a month) and it looks like there is a trial.

From a longevity perspective, TeamSpeak might be a good choice for my group, since it's been around in some shape or form for like 30 years at this point. My group has moved like 3 or 4 times. Not sure if we'll find a forever home but the longer we can stay somewhere, the better.

[-] snowsuit2654@piefed.blahaj.zone 25 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

From my quick testing I did the other day, the conclusion I came to was:

  • Fluxer looks like the easiest drop-in replacement for my group. I agree I am also a little hesitant about its longevity & funding.
  • Matrix UX leaves some to be desired, but it's functional and I like the E2EE.
  • We don't have anyone good enough at selfhosting in my group to even attempt Spacebar.
  • Stoat just doesn't seem viable. Lack of screenshare is a big issue for my group.

Surprisingly, the new TeamSpeak 6 looks pretty okay to me, but the UX is pretty different so might have a little bit of a learning curve for some people in my group. It costs money for a server but honestly my group is fine with that. We used to pay for a Mumble server back in the day but it doesn't have robust text channels so we don't want to move back to that.

snowsuit2654

joined 2 weeks ago