I agree with that first quoted person that "the cost of proper cybersecurity is not $0 and that means small business have more costs" but I'm not sure I see how lawmakers are going to make cybersecurity easier for small businesses. I guess they could give Microsoft a bunch of money to provide discounted malware protection? That's the terrible idea assume they're going to go with, but realistically, how can you possibly secure 80,000 small businesses' IT networks without the business incurring some expense?
It's all steamdeckers. They're using the power of portability.
There's no rules across instances, votes are whatever you want them to be. Either yes this is good/right/ilikeit/peopleshouldseeit or no it's wrong/spam/misinformation/wrongcomm/idontlikeit/idontlikeyou/ithurtmyfeelings.
Down votes could easily be for the source, Marques has done some questionable stuff, or the format since it's just a summary, or the community someone doesn't feel like it belongs in this community.
Why give a shit what some tech executive imagines engineering to be
I wonder if the main benefit is from switching to a airflow optimized fan that has suddenly been put into a static pressure system (the lasko) to fans that are designed for significant pressure (the arctic fans).
It's a reasonable idea, but the filter cube is based on ease, basically only has 2 parts (plus tape, so 3), and you can get at of them at your local Meijer or lowes, no special order, no wiring. This adds complexity and cost for a nicer experience. At some point it makes sense to just buy yourself a coway
They wrote what we're all thinking!
Worst days so far.
Interesting, I will have to try that sometime, when I only want part of a file committed I do an awkward stash, apply, revert individual lines dance then commit, then stash apply again. This seems much easier