[-] verstra@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

I would like to believe that say amphibians would adapt eating flies or other insects if mosquitoes are lacking.

[-] verstra@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

Can someone ELI5?

[-] verstra@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago

A very real problem with a very unreal solution

[-] verstra@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

Anyone seen the rick and morty spaghetti episode?

[-] verstra@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago
[-] verstra@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

Woah, the landing page looks like some unfinished Wordpress template and the forge itself looks 15years old. Nothing wrong, with the former, I just don't like the style.

[-] verstra@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You, my friend, should try EdgeDB. A database and an ORM in one.

When you change the data model, you can get to 100%, which you say is impossible for ORMs

[-] verstra@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

No biggie, it a nice entry barrier to have, because nowadays, there just too much new frameworks and languages and crypto currencies.

[-] verstra@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

That's because the tooling is not there quite yet. For what you describe, that would have to be implemented by the compiler bindings for your language. And it's not that hard - basically one function. But yeah, not there yet.

[-] verstra@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I strongly believe that code formatting does not hold any information and that because of it, compilers should reject non-normalized code, saying "run a formatter first". We have the tooling for most of the languages to make this absolutely painless, remove all head scratching of "what the hell is up with this code style" and just focus of the semantics. I believe that you should be allowed to produce code abominations like this code sample and have it auto-formatted into the code style that everyone can easily interpret.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

verstra

joined 1 year ago