It'd be great if AI is powered entirely by renewables, but how trustworthy is that target?

Companies and politicians are known to drag their feet switching to renewables or use greenwashing to show they care more about climate than they actually do.

The 72-cell panels, comprised of Oxford PV’s proprietary perovskite-on-silicon solar cells, can produce up to 20% more energy than a standard silicon panel.
Oxford PV has been developing and working to commercialise this technology since 2014, with a recent module efficiency record of 26.9%

I get creeped out even answering to an AI bot screening phone support calls. Having video AI interviewer is a whole another level of creep.

Ah, got it.

Here's another source:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/08/21/ford-electric-vehicles-hybrids/

Probably means the solutions to plastic crap are wild/crazy/unconventional ideas implying "loony".

I hope never lol

They seem to be experimenting with that for sure, but need to ensure quality of the model doesn't degrade, as per source article:

Anthropic’s chief scientist, Jared Kaplan, said some types of synthetic data can be helpful. Anthropic said it used “data we generate internally” to inform its latest versions of its Claude models. OpenAI also is exploring synthetic data generation, the spokeswoman said.

Only a trace amount in the air. Water is the best source but energy intensive to extract.

This seems to be the conversation logs being used for training Bard, without the bits pulled from Gmail etc. (if we're to believe the bard workspace TOS). I believe OpenAI does it too, for improving chatgpt, unless you've an enterprise subscription.

Yeah. I guess we could fetch all image ids from the database excluding those uploaded to our local instance, and loop them through the DELETE /image/delete/{delete_token}/{file} API. But I've no idea how to get the delete_token, seems like it's available only during image upload.

I was talking about the storage space on server, not on the user side! Sorry if I wasn't clear.